home
RSS
'Dirty 30' want EPA air pollution rule repealed
June 14th, 2012
07:15 AM ET

'Dirty 30' want EPA air pollution rule repealed

Lines are being drawn on Capitol Hill over an EPA rule to reduce air pollution from the nation's power plants.

Last year the Environmental Protection Agency approved the controversial Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (or MATS; also known as MACT), the country's first national protections rule designed to limit the amount of heavy metals like mercury, arsenic, chromium, nickel and other toxic air pollutants released by power plants that burn coal and oil - toxins many suspect cause cancer and other health problems.

The new standards set work practices that include an annual performance test program for new and existing electric generating units.  This would include an inspection, adjustments, maintenance and repairs.

"Utility MACT is specifically designed to kill coal as well as all the good paying jobs that come with it," Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) said on the Senate floor Tuesday. "The vote on my resolution will likely be the one and only opportunity to stop President Obama's war on coal - this is the one chance for my colleagues to show their constituents who they really stand with."

And Inhofe says 29 others have joined his petition to repeal those protections. The number is significant because Inhofe's Senate Joint Resolution 37 could nullify the EPA rule under a little used law called the Congressional Review Act.  With a CRA, a vote in committee is not required if 30 senators have signed on to support it.

The legislation can be discharged from committee and sent straight to the Senate floor for a vote. But that's not all. If passed, under CRA, the EPA would be prohibited from adopting substantially similar clean air standards in the future.

And that's what worries John Walke, Clean Air Director of the Natural Resources Defense Council. Walke says the whole process has been shrouded in secrecy, that Inhofe has refused to name the 29 senators - whom Walke calls the "Dirty 30" - supporting his petition. Concerned, Walke sent a letter to Inhofe asking him to disclose their names and calling for transparency and openness.

"The EPA has issued generationally important health safe guards that will save tens of thousands of lives and avoid hundreds of thousands of asthma attacks by reducing toxic air pollution from power plants that burn coal and oil," Walke said. "Those safeguards are over a decade overdue already yet they are facing fierce political attack from conservatives in congress that are trying to eliminate those safeguards and delay any weaker replacements indefinitely."

"The Senate will vote in the next 2 weeks on a bill by Sen. Inhofe that will go even further by not only nullifying these health safeguards but also prohibiting EPA from adopting any similar safeguards to reduce this dangerous air pollution. This legislative weapon is the nuclear weapon of congress with the radioactive spillover effect that poisons the landscape for officials trying to follow the law to protect the American people."

But Matt Dempsey, Communications Director for the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and a member of Inhofe's staff told CNN the senator's bill has widespread bipartisan support. "We've got well over 30 Senators in this body that are committed to ending President Obama's war on coal. We have support from republicans, democrats, business groups and labor units from all across the country," he said. "Senator Inhofe was clear in his speech while the NRDC is using scare tactics, this resolution would allow the EPA to go back to the drawing board and write a regulation that balances environment needs with a growing economy."

The American Lung Association is critical of Inhofe's strategy.

"We strongly oppose Senator Inhofe's extreme resolution that would permanently block EPA's life saving mercy and air toxic standards," said Paul Billings, vice president \with the American Lung Association. "The Clean Air Act required EPA address toxic air pollution from power plants in 1990. It has taken over 20 years to get to this point where power plants must clean up this pollution. These standards will prevent up to 11,000 premature deaths each year and protect millions from the consequences of toxic air pollution including mercury which damages children's neurological development and intelligence."

According to the EPA, power plants are the biggest source of toxic releases into the air, including 50% of mercury emissions and 77% of acid gas emissions. When that mercury reaches water it changes into a highly toxic form of methylmercury. This can build up in fish, and people are exposed by eating that contaminated fish. The agency says exposure to methylmercury is dangerous for pregnant women, unborn babies and young children.

Existing plants will have 4 years to comply with MATS. The EPA estimates about 1,400 units will be affected - 1,100 coal-fired units and 300 oil fired units at approximately 600 power plants. They say many of these plants already meet some part of the standards.

But many in the industry share Inhofe's concerns about MATS and support his efforts to repeal the rule.

"The MATS rule and the very short timelines associated with compliance will force the premature retirement of many coal-fueled generating facilities and potentially jeopardize electricity reliability," said Melissa McHenry, a senior manager at American Electric Power in Columbus, Ohio. "The MATS rule would result in dramatic and irreversible changes to the nation’s electric sector leading to higher electricity costs, killing jobs and creating a ripple effect through the American economy."

Offering an alternative to the Inhofe resolution, Senators Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Mark Pryor (D-AR) are expected to unveil a bill that would keep MACT intact, but extend the effect date out six years from 2015 to 2018. For Alexander, the issue is personal.

"This rule requires utilities in other states to install the same pollution controls that TVA already is installing on its coal-fired power plants. TVA alone can't clean up our air," Alexander said. "Tennessee is bordered by more states than any other state. We are surrounded by our neighbors' smokestacks."

But Inhofe says the Alexander-Pryor bill is just a "cover vote" and will likely never actually be voted on.

"The senators who want to kill coal by opposing SRJ 37 will put their names on the Alexander-Pryor bill as cosponsors to make it look like they are saving coal when in reality this bill kills coal but just puts if off for six years. The time is now to put a stop on Obama's war on coal."


soundoff (65 Responses)
  1. KETINA BARLEY

    I want to say thanks once again to this great man called Dr Zuma and his spiritual way of helping people i lives in USA with my husband we love each other and also he care about me always look forward to make things easy for both of us 9 years after our wedding, we both work harder to make a family greatest surprise, we have a kid after some times again, we have another one so with this, we live in peace and he was so honest to me shortly, he started misbehaving that i don’t know what is going on then i asked him. Darling what is going on? you are so strange to me this few days hope i have not offended you? he said no. Not knowing he have an affair with one lady out side who promised him a car and apartment in one estate were i cannot see him also when he cannot see me i manage to stay with him pleading him he should forgive me if i have wrong him he started complaining he has no money that he has lost all his money in his business that he needs some money then i asked him how much is this money you are looking for? he did not know i can afford it. Then, he said $14,000USD i promised him i we give it to him just for him to care about his family. My greatest surprise, the next day, i went to work and our two kids were in school not knowing his going to leave the house before i come’s back i met some of his things outside i was waiting for him to come back he never come back i cried i miss him so much and he have taking all my money away i was only left with $800USD. One day, as i was ready a blog i saw a testifier made by someone in Australia called Jessica telling people about how this man call Dr Zuma helped her and the man’s contact email was there and his mobile number then i contacted him for a help and really, he brought back my husband now am so happy my brothers and sister if you are in such relationship problem kindly via Email spiritualherbalisthealing@gmail.com or Whatsapp +15068001647 Blog: https://spiritualherbal.blogspot.com he will help you solve all your problems.

    June 25, 2021 at 11:15 | Report abuse | Reply
1 2

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Advertisement
About this blog

Get a behind-the-scenes look at the latest stories from CNN Chief Medical Correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen and the CNN Medical Unit producers. They'll share news and views on health and medical trends - info that will help you take better care of yourself and the people you love.