![]() |
|
May 10th, 2012
04:37 PM ET
Breast-feeding: Too much of a good thing?It's hard to avoid staring at the cover of Time Magazine this week. If you're on social media like Twitter and Facebook, the widely shared image may have arrived on your screen before you ever saw it in the supermarket. The provocative cover shows Jamie Lynne Grumet, a 26-year-old mother from Los Angeles, breast-feeding her son. This isn't your typical mom-and-baby shot: Grumet's son is 3. In case you were wondering, Grumet told CNN's Erin Burnett that her son is actually breast-feeding in that now-iconic image. Grumet said her own mother breast-fed her until age 6, and Grumet still remembers it. "I'm proud of her," Grumet said. The picture promotes an article about the growing popularity of "attachment parenting", a theory first advocated by Dr. Bill Sears and his wife, Martha, in their 1992 best-selling guide “The Baby Book.” The Searses argue that co-sleeping, “baby wearing” (where the baby is attached to the parent with a sling) and extended breast-feeding will help parents respond better to the individual needs of their babies. Celebrities such as Mayim Bialik of "The Big Bang Theory" are also promoting ideas about attachment parenting. Bialik said on Friday that she still breast-feeds her 3-year-old son. "He's not done breast-feeding, and I'm not ready to tell him not to," she said. Many moms and dads have strong opinions about these practices, especially the breast-feeding advice. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends babies be breast-fed exclusively for the first six months of their lives. "We don't all nurse older kids," Bialik said of mothers who subscribe to attachment parenting ideas. "But the notion that a child's voice matters, that every child is different, that's the basis of attachment parenting." Heather Curtis, wife of Fark.com founder Drew Curtis, told CNN's Geek Out that she practiced breast-feeding for an extended period, carried her babies in slings and practiced co-sleeping, as Bialik did. So did Caryn Rogers, a science writer for the Preeclampsia Foundation. "I didn't really choose to eschew conventional care so much as chose to get what I believed was the most evidence-based care," Rogers said. Grumet said that sleeping with her baby does not affect intimacy with her husband. Watch: Breast-feeding cover-mom defends pose "I think intimacy is extremely important in a marriage and I think a strong marriage is going to be a great foundation to show your children how to be raised confident and happy and I had that with my family, too," she said. Time: Extended breast-feeding is more common than we think CNN.com readers expressed mixed views on the subjects of the best age to stop breast-feeding and the appropriateness of the Time cover in general. See what they said. We want to know what you think. Is it OK to breast-feed well past toddler-hood, or is it too much of a good thing? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() About this blog
Get a behind-the-scenes look at the latest stories from CNN Chief Medical Correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen and the CNN Medical Unit producers. They'll share news and views on health and medical trends - info that will help you take better care of yourself and the people you love. |
|
"Hey, Ma. Can we just stay home and watch a movie? some popcorn?
Not tonight sweety...I've got a headache.
From Time Magazine:
"In 2008 the American Academy of Family Physicians did its part to try to destigmatize nursing toddlers and older children, applauding the WHO guidelines even as it acknowledged that extended breast-feeding “is not the cultural norm in the United States and requires ongoing support and encouragement.” The group added: "It has been estimated that a natural weaning age for humans is between two and seven years. Family physicians should be knowledgeable regarding the ongoing benefits to the child of extended breastfeeding, including continued immune protection, better social adjustment and having a sustainable food source in times of emergency. The longer women breastfeed, the greater the decrease in their risk of breast cancer. There is no evidence that extended breastfeeding is harmful to mother or child."
And it’s good for kids too, packed with nutrients and more fat and calories for older nursers. That’s the amazing thing about breast milk; it evolves to meet the needs of the child it’s nourishing. ..."
Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2012/05/10/extended-breast-feeding-is-it-more-common-than-we-think/
I breast fed all of my children, but like most moms, the emergence of baby teeth ended that phase of their development. Ouch! In this photo however, it is obvious that this child is 10-15 pounds overweight, and no longer needs the calories from breast milk. So I'm puzzled as to why breast feeding is continuing.
"When he's fifteen, ask him if he likes this picture"
Son (at fifteen): "Mmmmph mmphhh – what? Mmmmphhh mpmmh"
by the age of 15 he will be so beat up by the bullies, all he will want to do is stay home with mom.
OR
he will be the baddest a55 around and nobody will say boo-b to him.
At 15, his friends will be asking for a turn!
Since we are getting N A T U R A L how about time post me and my man Hangin Lowe in the act creating one of those little suckers? Following that issue should be about gay rights showing two guys in the pony ride position/ Oh, excuse me...my N A T U R A L too much for you? Then keep your crap to yourself and I will keep mine to myself. Oh..wait...I'm kind of liking letting my trash just hang out there without restraint. Hmmm...how do you like it? LOL- this is very freeing- keep your kids away from me – I may get too N A T U R A L.
Gloria, it's too early in the day to be so drunk
depends, what time zone are you in?
It's five o'clock somewhere, and the only way I'm going to deal with this N A T U R A L idea is with a perfect manhattan, straight up.
This woman is nuts. Wait until the kid turns 16 and reacts to a lifetime of seeing this photo – he won't be able to decide just what to do next.
This is the funniest story I've seen in a long time. The woman on the Time magazine cover is semi-hot. Which doesn't hurt, does it?
HE IS GOING TO LOOK STUPID WHEN HE DRAGS MOM TO MEETINGS AT IBM SO HE CAN BREAST FEED AT AGE 76
I'd hire him. Meetings are usually boring..
With stories like this, life is just too damn easy for Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert.
LOL
Meh, there are a b'zillion parenting strategies out there. This is one. Eventually the child will push the boob away. You know, when friends come over... or when thier Mom is the only one in lunch room with a boob out. Hehe.
No wonder she is screwed up
Once they have teeth stop breast feeding for gawd's sake.
My child started teething at 3 mos, far too early to wean, and this is according to the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the World Health Organization. Who is anyone to tell anyone else how to fee their child? Show my studies that prove that extended breastfeeding harms children. As soon as you start looking, you'll see that there are significant benefits. Lower risk of cancer, obesity, diabetes, etc. The benefits don't just suddenly stop at age 1. But people don't want to actually read about it, they'd rather just REACT in the US.
This is right up there with the bird feeding mom.
We're one of the only cultures in the world that's afraid of breasts.
Who's afraid of breasts, I suckle on them all the time. But not for dinner.
Capt. Zeb .
You are correct, not appropriate for dinner.
However, very appropriate as an appetizer or dessert.
Has nothing to do with being afraid of breasts, but for goodness sake show some modesty and a little bit of class. You don't have to flaunt yourself breastfeeding a child that should have been weened 2 years earlier on the front of a magazine. Come on ladies-this looks sick to me.
I've got no problem with exposed breasts but encountering the sight of child that's old enough to walk around just sipping from the tap is unsettling. Kids at 4 or 5 start to get interested in the opposite sex, awkwardly enough (personal experiences). I believe that sucking a mother's breast is sending some mixed messages of what's acceptable for a boy to do with his mom and for a boy to do with potential love interest.
I'm jealous!
LOL!
She's a pervert
Time must be desperate for readers. What's the big deal here? What? Is someone now going to agitate for legislation regulating nursing and lactation? Forget it. The kid looks fine with it. If my mom looked like that I'd a nursed until I was ten!
Then again, what is the price of milk today? Something a cow does anyways?
UGH.
The measuring stick should be how well adjusted to life your child is and whether or not your child evolves into a gracious and functioning member of society. If s/he does, then the parent has succeeded. I don't know that sucking on your mom's breast for five years is going to help accomplish that, but, hell, I guess it can't hurt.
I'm sorry, but when a mother is still breastfeeding a child at 2+ years old, this is no longer serving a purpose for the child, this is an attempt to fulfill some need or emotional instability that the mother has. If you feel breast milk is still important at that age then fine, PUMP it and put it in a CUP. There is absolutely no benefit to a child of this age to continue to suck on his mother's breast. This child is going to suffer from this as he gets older. He's completely recognizable and will forever be "that kid". I wish the mother thought of him more than having her 15 minutes of fame. Sad.
3 years ago, a woman sued a school, cause they refused her from coming in and breast feeding her 16 yr old. Look it up.
Exactly!
There's got to be positives and negatives to her doing this, but it wouldn't surprise me if this kid at age 3 has a higher IQ than others his age. I can see how people find this odd, so do I, but I haven't given this much thought so my opinions on this now would be presumptious and ignorant. How many people do we know personally that has breastfed beyond our confort zone? How many people were never breastfed? Compare and contrast the two... I'd say almost certainly feeding naturally from your mother is better than from a cow or synthetic.
Funny how all the guys love it. Let's put some fat lady on there with big hangers and suddenly they won't be such supporters. Bigger issue for me is showing the kid's face. You as an adult, want to make a statement, fine, but leave your innocent kid out of it.
If a child is old enough to tell you they are hungry, they are too old to breast feed. And putting that photo in the public domain is an outrage. Does she know what this child will go through when he goes to school? Does she care? I hope she's saving up for his therapy.
This is one of the most idiotic stories I have ever seen on CNN. Who cares if some women are disturbed and ignorant enough to breastfeed their children after they're 2 years old, much less +3 years old? As far as I'm concerned, this is just a stupid excuse to show this ridiculous picture on the website.
My problem is that this young man will never be able to avoid this picture for the rest of his life. His mom forced him into this picture and onto the national spotlight. For the rest of his life, when you google his name... this will come up.
Who cares? Its not like he has been accused of murder. Despite the media's efforts, this is not really a controversial issue.
And bullied the rest of his life for it. But we want to place laws on others and not the source, the mother.
Lucky kid !!!
tough for the kid- he has not been given any "choice" here, and yet when he's an adult, he'll have to carry this around...and at THAT point, he may not have made such a choice. Rather unfair if you asked me. But...alas, she did not ask me!
Who cares? Its not like the child has been accused of murder. Despite the media's efforts, this is not really a controversial issue.
Sometimes you just have to laugh at the insanity. This is one of those times. Liberals, LOL!
Huh? Oh, you're one of those unfortunates who sees everything as some kind of political binary situation. I want you to squeeze all three of your brain cells together and read this carefully: this has nothing to do with politics. The entire world is not an exercise in political polarization.
This is another example of the media making a mountain out of a molehill and trying to insight needless controversy. There is no "firestorm" here.. your average reasonable person does not really care about the breastfeeding habits of strangers. The truth is that nobody knows what the absolutely correct approach is – even the so called experts often contradict themselves . Furthermore, specific parenting techniques may work for some, but not others, there are too many variables to make blanket recommendations. We all have to make our own choices with the best available information and not try to insist that our way is the only "correct" way.
The next issue of Time will have her sucking the milk out of a man.
So if we as a public are to be subjected to public breast-feeding because the mother 'is not ashamed', is it alright for men to urinate in public places now? I mean, it's a natural act. We're not ashamed of it.
It's her choice, and there are medical opinions backing it (& not). Some pretty close-minded opinions given in response. Who are we to judge her choice or others our own? Who knows precisely where the line should be drawn, but it's a personal one for sure.
Ya, saw this in Game of Thrones. I'm sure that kid will turn out just fine.
let that boy go!! pump the milk and put it in a cup if you are really concerned for his health
And finally it will have a full blown donkey show on the front page.
i have three kids. i breastfed all three for varying lengths of time. my oldest i barely breastfed at all, and now i am ashamed to say i'm not as emotionally bonded with her as i am the youngest whom i breastfed an extended period of time (not like this lady, but much longer than i anticipated).
i'm not advocating breastfeeding until 6, but i do think there is a link between breastfeeding and a strong bond later in life
CNN. Controversy No News.
Or CNN: Commentary Not Necessary
The irresponsible aspect is the picture. This should be a private act between a mother and her children. The real sad thing is that she really doesn't breast feed him with him standing on a chair. This is just pure sensationalism and I have lost respect for Time magazine for it. But, ever since the advent of the internet, media has been in a downward spiral. But somehow, they could lose millions of dollars and there is always someone that is willing to pay big bucks just to have their agenda heard.
Are you a parent? Well, you're doing it wrong. Grow up with parents? They did it wrong. Going to die alone? You're doing it wrong. Still reading this? You're doing it wrong.
Come on folks, this is a non-issue. Its okay for the mother, its okay for the kid. Its okay for everybody except for those who have intimacy phobias. Move beyond them. If you can except gays, you should be able to accept moms taking care of their kids.
"Grumet said that sleeping with her baby does not affect intimacy with her husband."
I'd like to read her husband's opinion...our Pomeranian in our bed affects our intimacy!
That cover should read "Hey mom, Got Milk?"
Oh yes, let's generate more emotionally stunted, wimpy, selfish, disconnected yuppie larvae with this sort of "parenting'! Totally disgusting – the whole notion of this form of "parenting." It borders on obsession. Have kids if you wish, but get a life and give them one as well. Reminiscent of that In Living Color sketch with the grown man still attached with the umbilical cord, no?
Are you really that knowledgeable about parenting that you can pronounce such harsh judgements? Sounds to me like you have your own issues to work through.
If women can breast feed their 30 to 60 yr old boyfriends or husbands, whats the beef with breast feeding a 3 yr old?
There was a time when mothers knew what to do naturally, using her animal instincts without having to turn to books or the advice of experts. I have confidence in most moms, who breastfeed, to decide what's best as they have already made the most natural and best choice for their child. I could much more easily criticize baby formula from a can, or packaged baby foods.
Way to miss the point, Billy. The issue here is not breastfeeding. The issue is breastfeeding the kid until he's 35.
Not 35- three.
I've see more bare breast tissue on any SI Swimsiut issue or Globe Rag....And that IS all for a look at their woman's body. This may be provocative, but really.... Why don't all of you go out and do something positive for your worl and leave Lynne's alone.
Ah, another one who can't read. Try again. Have a smart person read the article to you.
SICK!!
I don't see a big deal with breastfeeding until 3. I remember reading it in my developmental Psychology book that it is healthy for children to be breastfeed rather than those milk products from the counter. This is based on researches that professional have done in the field. And this is one of the reasons why I don't understand why people make such a big deal on it when I would do it for my children's health.
A kid that old can eat regular food, breastfeeding is for BABIES only.
Yet another thing, like marriage, religion, and sexual orientation that is none of my damned business. When are we going to start leaving each other alone. What the hell is wrong with us that we have to control each other. The fact that I think she's out of her mind does not give me the right to tell her that, or to tell her she's wrong. The only person who gets to weigh in on this with her is the boy's father. That's it.
Best way to spoil a child. And then we have to deal with the brat you raised. Way to fail at being a mom and teaching your child self-control.
I'd rather see a 3 year old drink his mother's breastmilk than cow's milk, which humans are not meant to drink.
"not meant to drink". Oh? And where is this edict written? On the back of the soy wafers you scarf down, I'll wager.
I don't care if she breast feeds him or not – so what! But on a magazine in the checkout line at the grocery store? They're both standing; he's on a chair; she's wearing Spandex. Go do it behind closed doors. Not EVERYBODY cares to see it done like this. It just seems out of place – the "shock" effect. What's the point anyway? To sell a zillion magazines?
Bingo! And I'm sure she didn't pose this way for free.
Are you sure this is not a young looking short guy she knows?