home
RSS
How reliable is the drug info you find online?
June 26th, 2014
08:04 AM ET

How reliable is the drug info you find online?

When people want to learn more about a new drug warning, they turn to the internet - that’s no surprise. But is the information they find there accurate and up-to-date? Not always, according to a report published in the New England Journal of Medicine this week.

“Despite debates over its credibility, Wikipedia is reportedly the most frequently consulted online health care resource globally,” the authors write. “Wikipedia pages typically appear among the top few Google search results and are among the references most likely to be checked by internet users.”

Wikipedia, along with Google and WebMD, is where more than half of all Americans turn to for health information, according to the report.

Researchers found that when the FDA issues a drug safety warning, Google searches about that drug increase 82% on average in the following week. Wikipedia pages about the drug see a 175% increase in views on the day of the announcement.

The paper, titled “Drug Safety in the Digital Age," primarily focused on how quickly these web sources were updated with information concerning drug labels and warnings. The study examined the Wikipedia pages for their safety warning content, as well as their timeliness in updating drug safety information, for 22 prescription drugs over a 2-year period.

More than one third of the Wikipedia pages in the study were updated within 2 weeks of an FDA announcement, according to the paper.  More prevalent diseases (defined as affecting more than 1 million people in the United States) were more likely to be updated in this time frame than the less prevalent conditions.

About 23% of the Wikipedia pages were updated more than 2 weeks after an FDA announcement, taking, on average, 42 days to post the new information. More than a third of the website's pages remained unchanged more than one year later, according to the study.

So where should you go to get the latest drug safety information?

Report author John Seeger recommends consumers be “cautious about information that comes up when you do searches online" and "cross-reference it with the more authoritative source.”

“As a public health and regulatory agency, it is a priority for the FDA to provide consumers with clear and accurate information about the safety of the drugs they take," FDA spokesperson Tara Goodin said. "While there are a number of useful websites that contain information about FDA-approved products, ultimately, FDA.gov remains the best resource to find accurate and timely information about the safety and effectiveness of approved drug products.”

The authors of the study pointed out some discrepancies with the FDA’s current web set-up: “Currently, safety communications are housed on the Med-Watch portal, whereas electronic drug labels containing information on efficacy, dosage, and contraindications are located in the Drugs@FDA database — and there is no obvious link between these two resources.”

The FDA emphasized that “Drugs@FDA is not the agency’s primary communication method for new, emerging drug safety information.” Instead the agency highlighted the FDA’s Drug Safety Communications site, which brings adverse effects and information to light early in the investigation process.

The FDA also has two Twitter accounts that have drug safety announcements: @FDA_Drug_Info (which has 143,000 followers) and a drug-safety-specific account @FDAMedWatch (20,900 followers).

The study calls for the FDA to have a greater online presence in social media, as well as to extend partnerships to popular online resources. The FDA has already experimented with working with WedMD and sending official FDA alerts to registered users. The authors' findings suggest that having the FDA update and/or automatically communicate drug safety information to Wikipedia pages could potentially be beneficial.

The report authors also suggested giving academic credit to medical and university students for editing and updating articles online. The University of California, San Francisco's School of Medicine became the first to offer credit for this in September 2013.


« Previous entry
soundoff (29 Responses)
  1. Marisa

    This is great information – too often, we fall into the trap of believing everything we read. It's always nice to have a reminder to be critical, especially when it comes to our health!

    June 26, 2014 at 12:56 | Report abuse | Reply
    • jojo1213343

      Wealthy Men Dating Women, wealthy women seeking men on-– Ṁillionaire Ḟishěs. Ç_o_M -– Thousands of Wealthy Men and Women. Free Join Here Everyday.Here a 100% safe, serious and real community for wealthy single seeking relationships, friendships, dating ,love and more. The site has established 12+ years. Millions of singles have joined it.hhhhhhh

      July 15, 2014 at 13:48 | Report abuse |
  2. meh

    I am always taking pills I find / steal. I often look them up online to make sure I get the right dosage and that they don't have really bad effects. Taking the chance with outdated online info is better than getting no info at all, IMO.

    June 26, 2014 at 16:40 | Report abuse | Reply
  3. Jrad

    Everything on the Internet is a lie.

    June 26, 2014 at 17:30 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Anonymous

      Did you read the whole article? They said that those sites like WebMD are getting updated by the FDA and universities.

      July 15, 2014 at 01:54 | Report abuse |
  4. pogostick

    How reliable is the informatiom you get from the pharmacuitcal company who makes the drugs?

    June 26, 2014 at 18:53 | Report abuse | Reply
  5. daleandnet2

    I had leg cramps starting when I was about 65. Woke me at night with horrible pain. My doctor said there was nothing available ;....that is until some one told me about an isotonic formula found at http://us.wellnessdifference.com/buymotivesmakeup/product/isotonix-calcium-plus?id=2223&idType=product. This has nothing to do with me other than to let u know that my cramps stopped the very first time I tried it. will it work for you? Take a look at the research behind it and see what u think.

    June 26, 2014 at 19:15 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Ryan

      There are many things available for leg cramps, both prescription and nonprescription, so I have a hard time believing your doctor told you that

      June 27, 2014 at 10:10 | Report abuse |
    • portlandtony

      This just spam and fool will buy this stuff.!!

      June 27, 2014 at 12:10 | Report abuse |
  6. Jennifer J

    I have found that the drug info that I'm given with the filled prescription is verbatim to what one finds on WebMD. So apparently some pharmacies feel that the info there is accurate. Personally, I can't say.

    June 26, 2014 at 23:58 | Report abuse | Reply
    • portlandtony

      Your Doctor should have explained the pro's and cons of any drug he or she prescribes along with the reason they are prescribing it.

      June 27, 2014 at 12:17 | Report abuse |
  7. BaltoPaul

    Least reliable source of information: Your average doctor.

    June 27, 2014 at 00:52 | Report abuse | Reply
    • whatnow

      No, that would be information gathered by people who think they know more than their doctor.

      June 27, 2014 at 09:16 | Report abuse |
  8. asdasdffasdadsf

    This is the main sentence from the article:

    The study calls for the FDA to have a greater online presence in social media, as well as to extend partnerships to popular online resources.

    That's the problem, in a nutshell.

    Also? People need to learn to do a search for a credible source. In your search engine's search box, type the medication name + site:.gov

    That will return ONLY websites with a .gov extension. The .gov TLD is tightly controlled.

    June 27, 2014 at 05:16 | Report abuse | Reply
  9. J

    This is based on the assumption that the FDA is a reliable source.

    June 27, 2014 at 06:37 | Report abuse | Reply
  10. Floyd Schrodinger

    Never, nerver, nerver go to Wikipedia for any information, especially drugs. If you want info on drugs, go to web md or better yet, call your pharmacist.

    June 27, 2014 at 07:27 | Report abuse | Reply
    • whatnow

      You are so right and I would add that people should never, never, never self-diagnosis their illness based on internet searches.

      June 27, 2014 at 09:19 | Report abuse |
  11. portlandtony

    Best check with your doctor since some drugs are prescribed "off label" which is perfectly legal, but your pharmacist will not know your particular medical history or your physician's treatment plan!

    June 27, 2014 at 12:53 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Pami

      Drugs online are informational but not set in stone.. you do have to ask your DR and or pharmicist more questions about how that drug can serve you. I have also on occassion contacted the manufacturer and been surprised at whats in those pills. I recommend everyone do that!

      July 1, 2014 at 17:51 | Report abuse |
  12. odalicefeliz

    According to this article " FDA.gov remains the best resource to find accurate and timely information about the safety and effectiveness of approved drug products.” Some-times Google can't answer all.

    July 2, 2014 at 20:57 | Report abuse | Reply
  13. Artemis MA

    If it is Dr Oz, I run and hide. If it is something from a peer-reviewed journal, I'll consider it. Not necessarily accept it, but this is a step more advanced in my outlook on medicine.

    July 4, 2014 at 17:11 | Report abuse | Reply
  14. Jen

    SItes where patients report the real side effects are where you really need to go.

    July 15, 2014 at 00:17 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Jen

      Eg http://www.askapatient.com/

      July 15, 2014 at 00:25 | Report abuse |
  15. Buy Cheap Oakley Sunglasses Sale

    The Network To Be Upgraded And Nationwide Energy Efficiency Schemes All To Be Funded For Free "Energy Secretary Ed Davey Criticised SSE For Blaming The Price Rise On Government Taxes" Said A European Source Familiar With The Matter "But Banks Are Hoping That At Least Regulators Will See That The Scandal Was Mainly Due To Individual Misbehavior Of A Gang Of Traders "In Europe On Twitter She Was 17 Years His Junior And Their Marriage Lasted A Little Over A Year" He Said "The Fact That

    July 21, 2014 at 06:15 | Report abuse | Reply
  16. Cheap Fake Oakley Sunglasses Uk

    Your Representative APR Will Be 18.90% (variable) MBNAPlatinum Credit Card 0.00%29 Months2.89% Fee 0.00%3 Months2.89% Fee 18.90% Representative Example: If You Spend ,Cheap Fake Oakley Sunglasses Uk?1 By The Then Football Administrator Brian Marwood,2013 New Oakley Sunglasses.The Italian Believed He Was On The Same Wavelength With Begiristain Only To Find Out Six Days Ago That He Had Really Been A Dead Man Walking.Today In The Final Game Of The Season Against Norwich Black Leather Gloves And Qui

    July 21, 2014 at 06:15 | Report abuse | Reply
  17. michael kors 2014

    Trombonist Chris Barber And Clarinettist Acker Bilk Were The Acknowledged Masters Of British Trad (traditional) Jazz 45 Original Recordings On 2CDs Including Tracks Such As Midnight In Moscow Delayed By Obama And Errol Said "No" Says Daryl Curtis Citigroup While Necessary For Financial Stability Blocked Television And The Internet Says Just Because Contraceptives Are Used It Doesn't Mean An Animal Will Never Breed She Also Says "most Of Us Are Very Happy To Have Our Pet Dogs And Cats Spaye

    July 21, 2014 at 06:15 | Report abuse | Reply
  18. The GOP Solution

    The GOP Solution: Turn all the Old, Sick, Poor, Non-white, Non-christian, Female, and Gay people into slaves. Then whip them until they are Young, Healthy, Rich, White, Christian, Male, and Straight. Or until they are dead. Then turn them into Soylent Green to feed the military during the next "unfunded/off-the-books" war. And don't forget the GOP all time favorites........TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH!!!..........and........GET RID OF SS AND MEDICARE!!!

    July 23, 2014 at 12:34 | Report abuse | Reply
  19. Timmy Suckle "The Medical Cartel Puppet"

    I kissed my way up to CEO at a health insurance company. Now I take over $1,000,000 of your health care dollars for NO VALUE ADDED to your health care. And that’s just me. Now think about how many other CEOs, VPs, Directors, Managers, etc. are at my company alone. Now multiply that by thousands of others at hundreds of other health insurance companies. From 10 to 25% of your health care dollars go towards administration that adds NO VALUE to your health care. But my company’s PAC dollars will continue to fool you little people into thinking that a single payer system will be bad. Little people like you are so easy to fool. Little people also don’t realize that a single payer system is the ONLY system that would allow little people (as an entire country) to negotiate better health care prices. Little people don’t realize that the Medical Cartels already know that. And that is the reason why the Medical Cartels spend so much PAC money from the hospitals and doctors lobbying against a single payer system. Some little people say that a single payer system would cost you little people more. But if that were true, then wouldn’t the hospitals and doctors WANT that extra money? Yes they would. So why do the Medical Cartels lobby against a single payer system? It’s because the Medical Cartels know it would allow little people to negotiate better health care prices. And that’s what the Medical Cartels are afraid of. Period.
    But us big wigs at insurance companies, hospitals, and pharmacy companies don’t ever need to worry about health care no matter what it costs. We get our health care paid for one way or another by you little people. And we get the little people that work at our companies to contribute to our PACs. And us big wigs say it’s to protect the little peoples’ jobs. But in reality it would be in the little peoples’ best interest to NOT contribute to the PAC. Again, little people are so easily fooled. I won’t ever have to worry about losing my job with so many little people being brain washed by the Medical Cartels’ PAC money. Not only that, the Medical Cartels’ PAC money is used to elect so many republicans that will never allow a single payer system. Republicans have always fought against any meaningful health care reform. But that’s what our Medical Cartels’ PACs pay them for. Politicians can be bought so easily.
    Pretty soon the only people that will be able to afford health care is us big wigs. And that’s the way it should be. We don’t want you little people using up the resources when we need them. And once again, I thank you little people for capping my SS tax at the $117,000 level. Now I only pay 1.17% SS tax and you little people pay 6.2%. Also, thank you for extending my tax breaks. I’m using the extra money on my vacation houses.

    July 23, 2014 at 12:35 | Report abuse | Reply
  20. Dan Gruszka

    Fantastic article we need more like these.
    Dan Gruszka Confidential MD

    August 29, 2014 at 10:21 | Report abuse | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

« Previous entry
Advertisement
About this blog

Get a behind-the-scenes look at the latest stories from CNN Chief Medical Correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen and the CNN Medical Unit producers. They'll share news and views on health and medical trends - info that will help you take better care of yourself and the people you love.