home
RSS
Fukushima: A closer look
February 24th, 2014
04:15 PM ET

Low radiation risks outside Fukushima zone, study finds

The safety measures imposed after the 2011 meltdowns at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant appear to have averted widespread health risks to the surrounding population, Japanese scientists say.

People who live on the outskirts of the evacuation zone surrounding the plant received only slightly more radiation than normal background doses in the year following the world's second-worst nuclear accident, researchers at Kyoto University concluded. The study indicates that the fallout from the crippled plant presents little hazard to those outside the closed zone, even in towns along its edges.

"In conclusion, food supply and associated regulations are considered effective in the study areas in Fukushima thus far, and external exposure is a major component of the radiation dose rate," the researchers found.

In the three towns that were the subject of the study, radioactive cesium left behind by the disaster is likely to raise the lifetime risk of cancer by about 1%, the researchers reported, a level "which is unlikely to be epidemiologically detectable."

"The lifetime excess risk is small compared with the baseline risk of the Japanese population," the study concluded.

The findings were released online early Tuesday (3 p.m. ET Monday ) in the U.S. scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Three reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant melted down in the wake of the massive earthquake and tsunami that struck eastern Japan in March 2011. The resulting fallout forced nearly 140,000 people from their homes, with only a small number allowed to return so far.

The Kyoto team tracked radiation exposures from the surrounding environment and from food consumption in three still-inhabited towns near Fukushima Daiichi, where the earthquake and tsunami triggered the world's second-worst nuclear accident.

About 460 residents of those towns wore radiation dosimeters for two months, in August and September of 2012, for the study. The researchers also studied the food consumption of 125 people, most of whom ate home-grown vegetables.

But they added one cautionary note; several people who worked in the surrounding woodlands had higher radiation doses over the course of the study.

"Because the neighboring forest is a major economic resource, rigorous external radiation monitoring is needed for residents who routinely work in the forest," it added.

The study was published as Japanese authorities announced they would allow about 350 people from one of the evacuated towns to return home permanently. Another 31,000 people could eventually return home, the government added.

In March 2013, the World Health Organization found any increase in illness was "likely to remain below detectable levels." The gradual unfolding of the calamity gave Japanese authorities time to evacuate many of the surrounding towns before they received high doses of radiation. In addition, many of those residents had already fled the destruction unleashed by the earthquake and tsunami that triggered the Fukushima Daiichi meltdowns, the WHO noted.

Post by:
Filed under: Cancer

soundoff (9 Responses)
  1. cali girl

    The radioactive material is washing up on California shores.

    February 24, 2014 at 16:57 | Report abuse | Reply
    • jujubeans

      Where did you get this misinformation and why are you spreading it?

      February 25, 2014 at 10:37 | Report abuse |
  2. Geoff manchip

    we are in Tokyo now and people are panicing and buying radiation detectors as hot spots have been found and another tank at Fukishima has leaked 140t into the ground

    February 24, 2014 at 20:57 | Report abuse | Reply
  3. CocoKnows

    Comments aren't working, are they?

    February 25, 2014 at 09:52 | Report abuse | Reply
  4. Nigel

    "the world's second-worst nuclear accident"... WRONG. Fukushima is BY FAR the WORST nuclear accident in human history as it is STILL LEAKING after almost 3 years. The press is not reporting the true danger. Why no further stories on dying starfish, sea lions, sardines, herring, etc? What about 100% of tuna contaminated with cesium? What about the EPA dramatically raising the "safe" limits for radiation in food and water after the Fukushima accident?

    February 25, 2014 at 16:25 | Report abuse | Reply
    • jujubeans

      google "Chernobyl"

      February 25, 2014 at 16:34 | Report abuse |
  5. stephen kastl

    When did CNN lose all moral bearings?

    February 26, 2014 at 19:17 | Report abuse | Reply
  6. D Mack

    I have just read an article on Earth911.com that is written by someone with a little common sense. An environmental website saying Nuclear power is our future, wow greenies with a brain. Bill Gates' Terrapower, Georgia's two new reactors and at last people starting to see what nuclear is all about and ignoring the Greenpeace hype and scaremongers and the opinions of the average university student who still wants to change the world on their parents nickel. http://www.earth911.com

    February 28, 2014 at 10:05 | Report abuse | Reply
  7. Genesis Badeaux

    Hi there. Very cool site!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Wonderful .. I will bookmark your web site and take the feeds additionallyI am glad to locate so much beneficial information correct here inside the article. Thanks for sharing

    http://www.bestoftabletpc.com

    April 15, 2014 at 06:44 | Report abuse | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Advertisement
About this blog

Get a behind-the-scenes look at the latest stories from CNN Chief Medical Correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen and the CNN Medical Unit producers. They'll share news and views on health and medical trends - info that will help you take better care of yourself and the people you love.