home
RSS
HPV rates down more than expected
June 19th, 2013
02:53 PM ET

HPV rates down more than expected

Cases of human papillomavirus (HPV) have significantly decreased since the advent of the HPV vaccine in 2006, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and numbers have outpaced even their greatest predictions.

"The prevalence of the types of HPV that commonly cause cervical cancer in women has dropped by about half in girls ages 14 to 19," said Dr. Thomas Frieden, CDC director. "That decline is even better than we had hoped for."

Specifically, rates of HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18 – the four types covered by the vaccines – have decreased by 56% in young girls.

Those numbers are surprising, said Frieden, because only about a third of girls have gotten all three recommended doses of the vaccine. He suggested that the extra immunity may come from girls who only got one or two doses, or so-called "herd immunity." That occurs when those who have been vaccinated cause there to be less virus floating around, therefore lowering the risk for those who haven't been vaccinated.

But despite the good news, Frieden says the CDC had hoped that 80% of girls would be vaccinated by this point, and more needs to be done.

"This should be a wake-up call that we need to increase vaccination rates, because we can protect the next generation of girls from cancer caused by HPV," said Frieden. "Fifty thousand women alive today will develop cervical cancer that could have been prevented if we had reached our goal of an 80% vaccination rate."

Why aren't more girls getting vaccinated? Frieden says the blame is split between doctors and parents.

"Providers are not consistently giving recommendations for vaccination and are not encouraging the vaccine at every (patient) encounter," he said. "Parents commonly say they don't think the vaccine is needed, or that their teen is not sexually active, or they have concerns about the vaccine."

But, he said, parents may be missing the point.

"We vaccinate people well before they are exposed to an infection, as is the case with measles," said Frieden. "Similarly, we want to vaccinate children well before they get exposed to HPV."

Dr. Warner Huh, an associate professor at the University of Alabama at Birmingham who is not connected with this recent report, but did help develop the vaccine, says he was equally surprised by the data.

"A drop of 56% in the HPV types contained within the vaccine is pretty substantial," he said. "I don't think anyone would have guessed we'd see a drop that high before this study."

Huh also echoed Frieden's concern about low vaccination rates. "I think we're all surprised that you'd see a drop that high with a vaccine penetration that low," he said.

HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection seen in the United States, and causes more than two-thirds of cervical cancer; it also contributes to head and neck cancers and anal cancers.  HPV affects 79 million Americans, and more than 14 million new infections are seen each year.

Post by:
Filed under: Cancer • CDC • Conditions • HPV

soundoff (98 Responses)
  1. Ethic's Board
    June 19, 2013 at 15:54 | Report abuse | Reply
  2. bankrupt1
    June 19, 2013 at 16:00 | Report abuse | Reply
  3. 321
    June 19, 2013 at 16:01 | Report abuse | Reply
  4. nc1965
    June 19, 2013 at 16:03 | Report abuse | Reply
  5. DB
    June 19, 2013 at 16:08 | Report abuse | Reply
  6. Shane
    June 19, 2013 at 16:15 | Report abuse | Reply
  7. AlanE
    June 19, 2013 at 16:16 | Report abuse | Reply
  8. Sunflower2
    June 19, 2013 at 16:22 | Report abuse | Reply
  9. Jim in PA
    June 19, 2013 at 16:32 | Report abuse | Reply
  10. Stacey1
    June 19, 2013 at 16:37 | Report abuse | Reply
  11. The Contentious Otter
    June 19, 2013 at 16:56 | Report abuse | Reply
  12. Kerry Berger
    June 19, 2013 at 17:03 | Report abuse | Reply
  13. bob
    June 19, 2013 at 17:03 | Report abuse | Reply
  14. G.L.
    June 19, 2013 at 17:03 | Report abuse | Reply
  15. billmosby
    June 19, 2013 at 17:06 | Report abuse | Reply
  16. GI Joe
    June 19, 2013 at 17:09 | Report abuse | Reply
  17. GI Joe
    June 19, 2013 at 17:10 | Report abuse | Reply
  18. Steve
    June 19, 2013 at 17:16 | Report abuse | Reply
  19. captain
    June 19, 2013 at 17:48 | Report abuse | Reply
  20. Big_D
    June 19, 2013 at 17:49 | Report abuse | Reply
  21. M.E.
    June 19, 2013 at 18:14 | Report abuse | Reply
  22. dreyfdh457
    June 19, 2013 at 21:29 | Report abuse | Reply
  23. JC
    June 20, 2013 at 09:35 | Report abuse | Reply
  24. sdgsdgeryery547
    June 20, 2013 at 10:38 | Report abuse | Reply
  25. vommaWHO
    June 20, 2013 at 22:19 | Report abuse | Reply
  26. talla ramakrishna
    June 21, 2013 at 15:15 | Report abuse | Reply
  27. CJG
    June 24, 2013 at 10:04 | Report abuse | Reply
  28. Truth_In_Data
    June 28, 2013 at 11:50 | Report abuse | Reply
  29. prergorurnind
    November 25, 2013 at 05:03 | Report abuse | Reply
  30. prergorurnind
    November 25, 2013 at 05:44 | Report abuse | Reply
  31. prergorurnind
    November 25, 2013 at 06:16 | Report abuse | Reply
  32. prergorurnind
    November 27, 2013 at 23:21 | Report abuse | Reply
  33. Diafinfaddy
    November 27, 2013 at 23:21 | Report abuse | Reply
  34. isosulley
    November 27, 2013 at 23:22 | Report abuse | Reply
  35. prergorurnind
    November 27, 2013 at 23:27 | Report abuse | Reply
  36. Scadscask
    November 27, 2013 at 23:31 | Report abuse | Reply
  37. isosulley
    November 27, 2013 at 23:39 | Report abuse | Reply
  38. Diafinfaddy
    November 27, 2013 at 23:40 | Report abuse | Reply
  39. kneeroigo
    November 28, 2013 at 02:19 | Report abuse | Reply
  40. kneeroigo
    November 28, 2013 at 02:24 | Report abuse | Reply
  41. prergorurnind
    November 28, 2013 at 02:26 | Report abuse | Reply
  42. HeeliArrels
    November 28, 2013 at 02:55 | Report abuse | Reply
  43. prergorurnind
    November 28, 2013 at 03:20 | Report abuse | Reply
  44. isosulley
    November 28, 2013 at 03:51 | Report abuse | Reply
  45. Nick
    May 9, 2014 at 14:48 | Report abuse | Reply
  46. noah
    May 9, 2014 at 14:49 | Report abuse | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Advertisement
About this blog

Get a behind-the-scenes look at the latest stories from CNN Chief Medical Correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen and the CNN Medical Unit producers. They'll share news and views on health and medical trends - info that will help you take better care of yourself and the people you love.