home
RSS
Pesticides in tap water, produce linked to food allergies
December 4th, 2012
01:59 PM ET

Pesticides in tap water, produce linked to food allergies

Pesticides in produce and drinking water may be playing a role in the increasing prevalence of food allergies, according to a new study.

Researchers looked at 2,211 people and found those in the top 25% for urine concentrations of chemical dichlorophenols – used to chlorinate tap water and keep pests off produce - were also 80% more likely to have a food allergy.

"Adults can develop food allergies even though they're not kids anymore," says allergist and study author Dr. Elina Jerschow. "Adult allergies to foods are on the rise. That certainly includes shellfish and fish allergies, but also peanuts. We don't know what influences this development. But having been exposed to dichlorophenols in our study suggests there could be some link."Researchers believe dichlorophenols may alter the composition of healthy bacteria growing in the human gut, which plays an active role in immune system functioning.

It's the "hygiene hypothesis" - that allergies result from too few exposures to microbes in our contemporary, sterile environments - with a twist: the anti-bacterial environment might also be found inside the intestines.

The study, published Monday in the journal Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, doesn't confirm that pesticides necessarily cause allergies or vice versa, but it does indicate a possible association.

"Pesticides, and insecticides in particular, are inherently toxic to human health," says Dr. Kenneth Spaeth, director of the  Occupational and Environmental Medicine Center at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, New York.

"This has been known for a long time in regards to large exposures. However, it is only in recent years that the harmful effects of low-level exposure from pesticides have begun to be revealed."


soundoff (44 Responses)
  1. GBfromOhio

    Reminds me of the article not too long ago that stated "Organic food not healthier for you than regular produce" then in the article it mentions the only difference iresearchers found was the lack of pesticides. Brilliant. I'm not one of these conspriacy, the sky if falling kind of guys, but we are systematically poisoning every aspect of this planet, water, soil, food, air, you name it. The global corporate concept that nothing matters except the bottom line has to change for all of our sakes.

    December 4, 2012 at 18:06 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Weboe

      Well said!

      December 4, 2012 at 18:24 | Report abuse |
    • Gobsmacked

      Amen to that!

      December 4, 2012 at 18:37 | Report abuse |
    • Tekelder

      You had me with you until you started with the evil corporate empire nonsense. Corporations are neither good nor evil. They have the sole purpose of turning a profit unless diverted from their only goal. It is the people who run corporations who give them "personality". You are a direct beneficiary of abundant low cost food as a result of mass production by some of the largest corporations in the world. It seems to me a little ungrateful, on your part, to imply that bringing all that visually perfect low cost produce to you is some kind of evil plot. The usage of pesticide has dramatically improved the lives of billions by reducing insect bourne disease and preventing the loss of food you need for your table. I too am concerned about pesticide residue in my food and water and what its long term effects may be on me and my family. Meanwhile we have plenty of food to eat and have several generations who have never experienced a "natural" famine, despite dramatic increases in the mouths to feed on this world.

      December 5, 2012 at 11:30 | Report abuse |
    • Primal 4 Life

      Sorry Tek but that low cost food you speak of is complete garbage. Nobody but the corp is a beneficiary. I am fortunate that I never have to eat it, many are not so lucky.

      GB is 100% correct. Corporations can't only cater to the bottom line, period.

      December 5, 2012 at 13:25 | Report abuse |
    • kat

      In that study 30% of conventionally grown produce tested had detectable pesticides vs 7% of organics and in all cases pesticides were below the legal limit. So it's not like all conventionally grown food is swarming with pesticides. If we want to continue growing enough food to feed an enormous population for a reasonable cost, perhaps it may be more beneficial to shift the dialog towards lowering the limit of acceptable pesticides and figuring out exactly which chemicals are toxic and in what doses. Every substance you put in your body has chemicals that at the right dosage, will either cause cancer or kill you. Plants don't exactly WANT to be eaten, y'know, so they produce their own poisons.

      December 5, 2012 at 15:45 | Report abuse |
    • peridot2

      Kat, the legal limit is giving us food allergies as determined by this study. Other studies have shown that pesticide residue and fertiliser residue are promoting if not responsible for the ever increasing rate of autism in children, 1 in 88 infants born today. The 'legal' amount of residue and the amount necessary to cause health problems may be very far apart.

      Amounts measured in micrograms may be sufficient to disrupt growing human brain functions. What may be legal has little to do with this process.

      What are we doing to ourselves with this chemical residue? Are we poisoning our children? Evidence seems to indicate there's a good chance it is happening. OTOH, too many are dependent on the high yield of chemical fertilisers and pesticides. This Red Queen race can't go on forever.

      December 5, 2012 at 19:05 | Report abuse |
    • Hexaploid

      @peridot2: "Kat, the legal limit is giving us food allergies as determined by this study." The study says no such thing. It just shows a correlation and asks the question, with no cause and effect connection. Yet you jump to the conclusion that it proves a connection. This is how misinformation gets spread throughout the uninformed community.

      "Guess what? Roundup = Agent Orange. "
      That is an ignorant statement, and is totally untrue. You are confusing Roundup with 2,4-D, which was a component of Agent Orange. But the dioxin in Agent Orange that was responsible for most of the bad side effects was a contaminant of the other component, 2,4,5-T.

      December 6, 2012 at 23:15 | Report abuse |
    • greent12

      Totally agree

      December 30, 2012 at 00:13 | Report abuse |
  2. Laura

    Pesticides are going to be the ruin of the human race. When will people get wise and do something about the corporate mentality?

    December 4, 2012 at 18:27 | Report abuse | Reply
  3. Styles

    Why is there pesticides in drinking water? :S

    December 4, 2012 at 18:29 | Report abuse | Reply
    • SixDegrees

      Read the article. They're there to kill bacteria and other, you know, pests.

      December 4, 2012 at 19:34 | Report abuse |
    • Aletheya

      Runoff from farm lands and suburbanites who spray chemicals on their lawns so they can have nice lawn grass that doesn't belong there in the first place.

      December 4, 2012 at 20:58 | Report abuse |
    • J

      This suburbanite does not spray pesticides on their lawn, city dweller. Quit blaming us for everything. So sorry that I don't want to live in a concrete covered, smog infested, craphole city with litter everywhere.

      December 6, 2012 at 16:52 | Report abuse |
  4. Gobsmacked

    Not only from water, but there seems also to be an issue with Monsanto's "roundup ready" crops, whereby the insecticide works as an insecticide in your gut, also, causing the same altered-flora issue as described above. Scary stuff.

    December 4, 2012 at 18:36 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Hickory

      Monsanto's Roundup Ready technology makes crops resistant to the herbicide glyphosate. Monsanto's BT technology expresses the a protein that will kill insects. Please know what you are talking about before posting. That being said, the extensive use of Roundup Ready technology and the use of glyphosate could have detrimental effects on the environment.

      December 5, 2012 at 06:54 | Report abuse |
    • peridot2

      Guess what? Roundup = Agent Orange. Still think that conventional produce is tasty and safe to eat? You're consuming micrograms of Agent Orange in your food.

      December 5, 2012 at 19:09 | Report abuse |
  5. Tekelder

    Malathion, generall considered a "safe" pesticide is also a well known sensitizer. Malathion has been widely used on bedding, as a grain preservative (to prevent insect infestation), and a general insecticide. If you have ever been on an international flight to the southern hemisphere you have probably been "fumigated" with malathion (by an aerosol application) before the plane lands.

    The author appears to be confused or uninformed. Dichlorophenol is NEVER used to chlorinate tap water. the only chlorination of tap water is either direct application of chlorine gas to the water, addition of hypochlorite (chlorine reacted with caustic to form bleach) of the addition of chloramines (chlorine reacted with ammonia because it is more stable than chlorine in water, thus remaining in the water longer which allows a lower dosing of the chloramine to be as effective as a higher dose of chlorine).

    Dichlorophenol is one of many chemicals used in industrial chemical syntheses including the manufacture of insecticides. The author failed to furinsh any information that would allow one to conclude that specific chemical is associated with increased allergies.

    December 4, 2012 at 21:08 | Report abuse | Reply
    • peridot2

      Pesticides are in drinking water due to runoff from farms and other agriculture. They are sprayed on plants, they dry, it rains, they're washed off onto the ground and enter the water cycle. Voila, you're drinking poison!

      It's simple yet horrifying, isn't it?

      December 5, 2012 at 19:15 | Report abuse |
  6. Neurosurge

    Finally the mainstream is catching on. Its about time.

    I hope they finally figure this one out. Guess what else is a pesticide folks...although many will say oh no it isn't "they say it is safe" and "everybody drinks it, it cant be"....CAFFEINE AKA 1,3, 7 trimethylxanthine is a natural pesticide that 95% of people use. Soda, coffee, tea, so called energy drinks. Do your own research if you do not believe. Ask the childrens parents who died from energy drinks.

    Caffeine facts: natural pesticide, decreases blood flow to the brain by up to 30% causing frontal lobe cell death, is a mild form of cocaine, causes an insulin response, disrupts dopamine and serotonin regulation (schizophrenics, most drink a ton of coffee which is why they are schizo), this is only a fraction of what this does to our bodies.

    December 5, 2012 at 00:19 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Taysha

      "(schizophrenics, most drink a ton of coffee which is why they are schizo)"

      Wow...I thought I'd read crazy things before, but this one takes the cake right there.

      Have you also read where caffeine can help improve Alzheimer and cuts down the risk for breast cancer? Lay off the coffee if you don't handle it well and don't touch my Juan Valdez.

      December 5, 2012 at 08:20 | Report abuse |
    • peridot2

      Neurosurge, I'm allergic to caffeine. I can't drink coffee, I can't have medications containing caffeine and I have to read labels to make certain my food doesn't contain caffeine.

      Caffeine a pesticide? That's one I've never heard or read before. Are you sure you aren't thinking of nicotine? Nicotine has been used as a pesticide in the past. It's very effective. It's a great poison, too. Tobacco makes a great compress for treat bee and wasp stings.

      December 5, 2012 at 19:24 | Report abuse |
    • peridot2

      After researching your claims, Neurosurge, one finds that much of your information seems to be from the Conspiracy Reality TV site. Several of your claims have been debunked: caffeine does not cause schizophrenia and plants make it naturally. Neither is caffeine used commercially as a pesticide.

      December 5, 2012 at 19:51 | Report abuse |
    • Neurosurge

      You people are all idiots. Keep drinking your caffeine and thinking your so called "diseases" are genetic. These are all facts on caffeine not conspiracy theory BS. Go to Wikipedia this is fact... Geez people are stupid.

      December 5, 2012 at 21:18 | Report abuse |
    • Don

      Caffeine Chemistry
      chemistry(dot)about(dot)com/od/moleculescompounds/a/caffeine.htm

      December 7, 2012 at 00:32 | Report abuse |
  7. Anon

    DUHHHHHHHHHH!!! Now take a closer look at genetically engineered crops which produce their own pesticides and you will see why people are "all of a sudden" developing gluten allergies. Humans evolved on gluten and didn't have that issue for hundreds of thousands of years, why the sudden appearance? GET A CLUE!!!

    December 5, 2012 at 10:17 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Tekelder

      Most plants, including food crops, contain "natural" pesticides without any genetic manipulation by man. Promoting fear of genetically engineered crops is misdirection of the educationally challenged by individuals with other agendas.

      December 5, 2012 at 11:18 | Report abuse |
  8. Portland tony

    Each and every one of us is uniquely different genetically and our immune systems quite possibly reacts differently the chemical and compounds that we ingest. I personally have lived a long life and throughout the years have been exposed to just about every carcinogenic chemical known to man. From DDT to "Roundup" and all the now banned "scientific breakthroughs" used as pesticides and to this day, I have no more allergic reactions to the environment than I was born with. So who knows?

    December 5, 2012 at 11:50 | Report abuse | Reply
  9. Speaking Up

    Pesticides are in our food and have contaminated the water. I would think that the concentration of the chemicals in the foods are more potent than in the water. . . Maybe someone else can address that concept. Consumption of water and vegetables are both essential. How do we purify our water from unwanted pesticides, herbicides, and discarded medications that are polluting our bodies? Britta can't do it all.

    December 5, 2012 at 11:54 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Ziona

      Check out the Berky filters. They will take it out.

      December 6, 2012 at 15:52 | Report abuse |
  10. Vogon Jelt

    It was very arrogant of you Earthlings to think those chemicals that kill other animals would not hurt you.

    December 5, 2012 at 13:15 | Report abuse | Reply
  11. William

    The study examined the levels of these pesticides and chemicals in tap water.

    Now for the question that no one likes to ask. What is the corresponding level of these chemicals in well water, and in people who drink that well water?

    December 5, 2012 at 13:46 | Report abuse | Reply
    • peridot2

      It would depend on the well, William. You should get your water tested for pesticides. Depending on where your well is and how close you are to agricultural and farming areas, pesticide levels will vary. One hopes the levels are nonexistent to very low for your water. Good luck.

      December 5, 2012 at 19:31 | Report abuse |
  12. Duck Duck Goose

    What a shocker. Color me surprised. Using something that's a poison has bad results. Next you'll tell me that being shot in the head is frequently fatal.

    December 5, 2012 at 14:08 | Report abuse | Reply
  13. dotheflippin'math

    Caffeine is a "dangerous pesticide"?? Agricultural pesticides do need more testing, and fertilizer runoff is a HUGE problem to marine life (it caused the Great Barrier Reef devastation), but caffeine?? That's crazy talk, just like all the conspiracy theories, Candida and "acid blood" bs the chiro and naturoquacks are spewing. Ever hear about the dangers of "dihydrogen oxide," and how it can kill anyone in 5min? Let's just say it doesn't "hold water."
    : D

    December 5, 2012 at 18:10 | Report abuse | Reply
  14. dotheflippin'math

    Kat, a lot of fruits and veggies evolved to be eaten, and thus propagated. Some seeds actually have to pass through an animal's intestines to sprout, just like some tree seeds can only germinate after there has been a forest fire. Why do you think apples and tomatoes are edible?

    December 5, 2012 at 18:15 | Report abuse | Reply
  15. J.D

    No offense to the authors of the study or to CNN for even bothering to report this but the study is published in a lousy journal, rarely used by any top-flight allergy academic to report any important or sound data

    December 5, 2012 at 22:15 | Report abuse | Reply
  16. B

    Round up is poison just look at the french study and the horrific tumours in the mice. Humanity wont live long with these toxins.

    December 6, 2012 at 04:09 | Report abuse | Reply
  17. David

    Wow it's about time the SHEEPLE WAKE UP IN LIFE!!! How dumb downed can Society be to not see they are Poisioning and trying to Kill off the population!!! Globalists Want Kill off at least 80% of the Worlds Population its the 1st Written law on the Georgia Guidestones AKA Satan's Ten Commandments

    December 6, 2012 at 10:40 | Report abuse | Reply
  18. Claudia

    I'm alergic to penut butter.

    December 6, 2012 at 14:16 | Report abuse | Reply
  19. larry5

    Fumigation practices at warehouses and other facilities where produce passes through on the way to market should be looked at. Food marked organic with the claim that no pesticides were used gets poisoned in transport on the way to the market. Then when problems arise this part of the puzzle is never seen.

    December 6, 2012 at 20:32 | Report abuse | Reply
  20. someguy

    Yeah... or you could just wash the fruit be for you eat it.

    December 6, 2012 at 21:40 | Report abuse | Reply
  21. Oxygen4Energy

    Oxygen in a can is a safe and easy way to get Pure Oxygen http://www.Oxygen4Retailers.com

    December 19, 2012 at 00:22 | Report abuse | Reply
  22. Amarissa

    What i do not understood is in fact how you're no longer actually much more well-preferred than you may be right now. You are so intelligent. You understand thus considerably with regards to this matter, produced me for my part consider it from numerous numerous angles. Its like men and women are not involved unless it is something to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your personal stuffs nice. All the time care for it up! Amarissa http://extra-latex.tumblr.com

    February 11, 2013 at 12:47 | Report abuse | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Advertisement
About this blog

Get a behind-the-scenes look at the latest stories from CNN Chief Medical Correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen and the CNN Medical Unit producers. They'll share news and views on health and medical trends - info that will help you take better care of yourself and the people you love.