home
RSS
Researchers: Chemical testing is 'inadequate'
June 26th, 2012
10:01 AM ET

Researchers: Chemical testing is 'inadequate'

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and other regulators are not using the best available science in their assessment of bisphenol-A's (BPA) safety, according to a statement released Tuesday by the Endocrine Society.

"Testing needs to include models of developmental exposure during critical life periods when organisms may be most vulnerable to even very low-dose exposure," says the world's largest group of researchers and clinicians who study how hormones function.

For a typical poison, a higher dose correlates directly with greater toxicity, but endocrine disrupting chemicals like BPA may be counter-intuitively more potent at lower levels, and during "windows of vulnerability" such as pregnancy, explains a 2009 scientific statement by the Endocrine Society.

That poses a problem for regulatory agencies' screening tests, which are based on traditional toxicology and do not detect the low-dose effects of chemicals on the endocrine system, said Frederick vom Saal, who co-authored the Endocrine Society's new statement.

The Endocrine Society also issued a revised definition for endocrine-disrupting chemicals, saying that any chemicals "that interfere with any aspect of hormone action should be presumed to produce adverse effects," regardless of whether the adverse effects are well understood.

Earlier this year, the FDA denied a petition by the Natural Resources Defense Council to ban BPA in food packaging, where the chemical is used in plastics and the lining of cans.

"FDA is constantly monitoring the science on the substances or products it regulates, including BPA," the FDA said in a statement to CNN. "The FDA does not have sufficient evidence at this time to show harm to humans at low levels of exposure to BPA."

The EPA has declined to comment.

"The FDA is using approaches to regulate endocrine disrupting chemicals that violate basic endocrine principles," said Vom Saal. "They are not so incompetent that they cannot understand this. It is just inconvenient to do so."


soundoff (4 Responses)
  1. Chavonex Hellbergz

    I’ll immediately grab your rss as I can not to find your e-mail subscription hyperlink or newsletter service. Do you have any? Please let me understand in order that I may just subscribe. Thanks.

    August 1, 2012 at 21:03 | Report abuse | Reply
  2. Codruta

    that was really ineiersttng, esp the part about American ginseng for some of us gals at a certain age brilliant timing! Will the women's conference be done over the web too?Current score: 0 (Please enable JavaScript to vote.)

    August 2, 2012 at 08:35 | Report abuse | Reply
  3. tomhua

    The e-book website copy to a new browser to open a URL http://www.znjnn.com

    October 2, 2012 at 22:56 | Report abuse | Reply
  4. icons pack

    I am assured, what is it — a false way.

    October 8, 2012 at 22:06 | Report abuse | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Advertisement
About this blog

Get a behind-the-scenes look at the latest stories from CNN Chief Medical Correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen and the CNN Medical Unit producers. They'll share news and views on health and medical trends - info that will help you take better care of yourself and the people you love.