home
RSS
Test may be better gauge of heart attack risk
October 10th, 2011
02:00 PM ET

Test may be better gauge of heart attack risk

A growing number of patients should consider blood tests that go beyond the standard cholesterol numbers to gauge their risk for heart disease, an expert panel says.

Patients considered at intermediate risk for heart disease, perhaps the majority of the population, should be tested for C-reactive protein, a panel of specialists concluded in the current Journal of Clinical Lipidology.

Total cholesterol, LDL and HDL do not do as well predicting heart attack and stroke risk in patients with diabetes or metabolic syndrome, especially if those patients are already taking a cholesterol-lowering statin medication, said Dr. Michael H. Davidson, who headed the 17-member panel.

“We wanted to give guidance. This is a common problem,” added Davidson, director of Preventive Cardiology at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine.

The problem is becoming more common as the prevalence of obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome increases. Metabolic syndrome is a combination of symptoms that can include abdominal obesity, low HDL (good cholesterol), high blood pressure, insulin resistance and inflammation.

“When a person walks into the office stomach first, that’s intermediate risk,” Davidson said. “Intermediate risk is the bulk of the population and we’re not sure what to do in many of those patients.”

Family history, lifestyle choices such as diet and exercise and whether a patient smokes also may be factors whether someone is considered intermediate risk.

Standard measures miss about 30% of patients who will develop cardiovascular disease, Davidson added.

The C-reactive protein (CRP) level is considered a marker for inflammation. CRP is associated with plaques in the blood vessels.  Plaque can narrow the blood vessels in coronary arteries and cause chest pain. They can also rupture and cause heart attacks and strokes.

The Women’s Health Study found C-reactive protein was better at predicting coronary events like heart attack than LDL, the bad cholesterol; HDL, the good cholesterol; total cholesterol; or a ratio between total and good cholesterol.

Another large-scale trial showed high C-reactive protein levels were able to identify risk of future heart disease in patients who had low LDL.

“Because traditional risk scoring and routine cholesterol screenings miss a significant percentage of patients at risk for events, consideration might be given to routine inclusion of CRP,” the task force wrote in the article.

In additional to coming out in favor of CRP, the expert panel said it would be “reasonable for many [intermediate risk] patients” to have a blood test measuring the number of LDL particles - in addition to the standard LDL cholesterol level.

LDL particles carry cholesterol to the blood vessels, but the amount of cholesterol each particle carries varies. A higher LDL particle number is associated with more plaque buildup.

Patients with a high LDL particle number are candidates for cholesterol-lowering statin drugs even if their standard LDL number is normal, the panel concluded.

The advice of the panel of lipidologists goes beyond what the American Heart Association recommends.

An American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force did not recommend any tests other than the traditional cholesterol in patients under 50 who did not have symptoms.

But this task force said CRP tests were “reasonable” in men over 50 and women over 60 and “may be considered” in younger men and women who were at intermediate risk.

Davidson said the panel’s opinions on assessing the risk of heart disease were the result of six months of work, but they do not constitute official guidelines. He added that the panel’s conclusions were based on the best evidence available, and he hopes they will prompt more research looking at how well these tests predict outcomes.


soundoff (7 Responses)
  1. cejad

    Thanks for this article. It’s a good point that raising HDL can cut heart attack risk. But to really lower risk, I’d also recommend checking out NutritionFacts.org—they’ve got great videos on diabetes and heart disease: http://nutritionfacts.org/topics/heart-disease/ (it’s a non-commercial, science-based website).

    October 10, 2011 at 18:44 | Report abuse | Reply
  2. Emily

    Nonsense. Fish Oil and Flax Oil are EXCELLENT for heart health but they never encourage to take it in the mainstream media. Why? Because our media is funded by big pharmaceutical companies and others who have a vested interest in promoting this propaganda. I can promise you that this 'test' is useless and is super expensive. PREVENTATIVE CARE by eating well, taking PURE supplements, exersize, and taking care of your mental health are absolutely vital and work 10 times better than any bogus test or pill.

    October 11, 2011 at 19:46 | Report abuse | Reply
  3. Elaine

    My understanding is that hsCRP is valid for systemic inflammation but not specifically vascular inflammation or plaque in the blood vessels as the article claims. For this reason, researchers are hard at work identifying markers that are specifically linked to plaque build-up; especially soft plaque because soft plaque rupture causes the vast majority of CV events. In fact, I have heard of one group (Aviir) that offers a cardiac risk assessment that incorporates 7 biomarkers specific to the formation, progression, and rupture of soft plaque. Notably, CRP is not included as one of the 7 markers because its association with soft plaque lacked strength. In my view, CRP is a good 'general' screen for systemic inflammation; however, it should not be used to "predict" a CV event.

    October 12, 2011 at 13:14 | Report abuse | Reply
  4. insulin resistance symptoms

    Diet plan is important, but exercise can be of the utmost significance because, together with moderating blood sugar, it can help to combat the unwanted side effects of diabetic issues.

    March 3, 2012 at 06:05 | Report abuse | Reply
  5. risk manager consultant at health facility

    You've made some decent points there. I looked on the web to find out more about the issue and found most individuals will go along with your views on this website.

    March 10, 2012 at 17:47 | Report abuse | Reply
  6. high cholesterol foods

    Hi, I do believe this is a great site. I stumbledupon it 😉 I may revisit once again since i have book marked it. Money and freedom is the best way to change, may you be rich and continue to guide other people.

    March 12, 2012 at 13:04 | Report abuse | Reply
  7. medical alert systems reviews

    Oh my goodness! Awesome article dude! Thank you so much, However I am having difficulties with your RSS. I don’t know the reason why I cannot join it. Is there anybody having the same RSS problems? Anybody who knows the solution will you kindly respond? Thanx!!

    March 12, 2012 at 16:02 | Report abuse | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Advertisement
About this blog

Get a behind-the-scenes look at the latest stories from CNN Chief Medical Correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen and the CNN Medical Unit producers. They'll share news and views on health and medical trends - info that will help you take better care of yourself and the people you love.