home
RSS
July 17th, 2011
02:00 AM ET

Researchers believe they may be a step closer to HIV vaccine

Researchers are hoping they are one step closer to a HIV vaccine – using HIV. At the 6th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogens, Treatment, and Prevention in Rome, researchers with the Maryland-based VirxSys Corporation announced the findings of their VRX1273 vaccine.

The vaccine is a genetically altered version of SIV, the version of HIV found in non-human primates. Over the course of six months, five infected monkeys were injected with the vaccine three times, while five others were given a placebo vaccine. After 18 months, it was found that 40% of the vaccinated monkeys had very low to undetectable amounts of virus in their bodies.

“We are well on the path to a functional cure, at least in monkeys,” says  Laurent Humeau, VirxSys vice president of  research and development.

“Although this pre-clinical study is modest in terms of size, it is highly unusual to see near non-detectable levels of the virus not only circulating in the blood, but also in the reservoirs where HIV is known to replicate,” said Joep Lange, M.D., Ph.D., professor of medicine at the Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, and head of the Amsterdam Institute of Global Health and Development.

In the monkeys, the vaccine’s effect was sustained two years after the initial vaccination, without the need for any booster shots.

Other researchers have created similar type therapeutic vaccines. In May, Dr. Louis Picker of the Oregon Health and Science University’s Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute announced a vaccine successful in preventing monkeys from acquiring SIV. Like the VirxSys vaccine, this was a genetically altered virus. In this case, the altered virus was  CMV, from the herpes family.

But making the leap from monkeys to humans is a big step. Therapeutic vaccines "have looked really good in monkeys – but monkeys are not people and SIV is not HIV," said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. "Really good concepts in primates have been duds in people.”

Unlike many antiretroviral drugs on the market,  a therapeutic vaccine such as VRX1273 has the potential to be  a  cost effective way of dealing with HIV. Unlike drugs that are taken for the entire course of a patient's  lifetime, this vaccine has the potential to administered just several times, possibly only once, over the course of a patient's life.

Humeau believes that he and his team are headed in the right direction and hope to start clinical trials in humans as soon as 18 months with approval from the U.S.  Food and Drug Administration.


soundoff (96 Responses)
  1. Goodthing

    So nice.A step closer to HIV vaccine,which is a good news to human beings. hope it can make a difference. Today many guys talk about "HIV vaccine" at my std dating site hloving, com.We all waiting for the new vaccine test can be put into practise.And bring some good news to this world to solve the serious "africa HIV"...

    July 17, 2011 at 07:08 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Jeff S

      Yeah, the world's population would be something like 0.02% higher! The death toll of AIDS is somewhere between traffic accidents and diarrhoeal diseases. I do agree though, we need to do something to slow down the population. Helping infectious individuals greater ability to spread disease throughout the population will end up bad. At the rate we're going, nobody will be able to survive in 100 years without giving a substantial portion of income for medications.

      July 17, 2011 at 18:07 | Report abuse |
    • george

      PLETH, Are you saying that if you were to get Cancer that you would be willing to completely forego treatment for the good of the world's population?

      July 17, 2011 at 18:39 | Report abuse |
    • bpadraig

      The over population argument is ultimately a classist and racist one. The reason is the underlying belief that it's the poor (with all their kids) who consume the majority of the resources where the exact opposite is true. Keep thinking though.

      July 17, 2011 at 19:40 | Report abuse |
    • MikeLong

      George– that brings up an interesting idea about the entire ethics and impact of medicine. Should we treat diseases thereby increasing ones potential to spread the "bad genetics" to their offspring? Either way you look at it, each generation is genetically weaker and Darwins theory of natural selection becomes twisted.

      July 17, 2011 at 20:10 | Report abuse |
    • JEM

      It is an "IST" against people who walk in the rain too much without galoshes or
      share contaminated needles during drug use. It is an "IST" against people who
      in our eyes acted recklessly and irresponsibly.

      July 17, 2011 at 20:54 | Report abuse |
    • Dude

      It would be nice if we found a cure for Hep C

      July 17, 2011 at 22:43 | Report abuse |
    • Bub

      40% of 5 monkeys had low to undetectable amounts of the virus after using the vaccine? 40% of 5 = 2. No need to make it harder to read.

      July 18, 2011 at 07:16 | Report abuse |
    • pat39

      @ Pleth, I think you've been hanging with George Bernard Shaw a little to much. Seriously, my "New World Order" detector is going crazy over here with the population control cr*p you're spewing.

      July 18, 2011 at 07:48 | Report abuse |
    • Alyssa

      @pat, the fact that you have a New World Order detector is disturbing enough.

      July 18, 2011 at 09:51 | Report abuse |
  2. rohit

    happy to kno that we are very closer to cure of hiv.e alll are aiting for the news of cure.cure may save many lifes in india 7 abroad.trials has too be takesn as soon as possible throughout the worldd & also in India. hiv vaccine will be blessing of life saving to many.hope to ghet the good news of hiv cure soon. god help them to get the right path to cure.

    July 17, 2011 at 09:49 | Report abuse | Reply
    • AnObsErthlng

      Those Indians going to stick around to imrpove their owb nation, or try to hitchhike ilegally elsewhere though? http://observantearthling.blogspot.com/2011/07/most-of-us-realize-that-illegal.html Inquiring minds want to know!

      July 17, 2011 at 21:45 | Report abuse |
    • Jeneva

      You've irmepssed us all with that posting!

      December 27, 2011 at 05:03 | Report abuse |
    • filevelhymp

      cpw5Jh akbndxvhjkqi

      December 28, 2011 at 04:34 | Report abuse |
  3. chump

    Will not be allowed for further testing due to the major pharmaceutical company's loss of $ if they allow this. FDA is bull &*%$

    July 17, 2011 at 12:27 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Tom, Tom, the Piper's Son

      Please produce the source of your claims.

      July 17, 2011 at 14:26 | Report abuse |
    • Pleth

      Don't fret. If the Republicans have their way, there will be no more FDA.

      July 17, 2011 at 15:37 | Report abuse |
    • bob

      the cost of treating an aids patient runs into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. with infection rates int he low single digits in most of the developed world, insurance companies would fall all over themselves if they could protect their clients from ever catching hiv even if the vaccine cost 1000$ a dose. a 1000$ times a billion or so people that could afford it – thats a trillion dollars. what drug company wouldnt want a prodct that could haul in a trillion dollars with a single dose cure for a horrible disease? they wouldnt want to sell a treatment if they could provide a cure.

      July 17, 2011 at 17:24 | Report abuse |
    • S1N

      I'm going to have to agree with Bob. The OP neglects the fact that the health insurance lobby (when combined with various lobbies of health care providers) is just as influential as the pharmaceutical lobby. Also, remember that the pharmaceutical companies would stand to make massive amounts of money. HIV / AIDS treatment is only expensive for patients with the disease. A vaccine can be marketed and distributed to the population at large. The loss of a few very profitable patients would be counterbalanced by millions, if not billions, of less profitable (but still profitable) masses.

      July 17, 2011 at 17:42 | Report abuse |
    • george

      From what I got from the article, they gave the vaccine to already infected monkeys, not to those not infected with SIV, I would assume that in humans it would work the same way. To me it seems more like a treatment than a vaccine.

      July 17, 2011 at 18:43 | Report abuse |
    • jason

      Pleth, and if the Dems have their way, there will be no more USA. We will just have the United States of Mexico.

      July 17, 2011 at 19:26 | Report abuse |
    • Dave

      Agreed. FDA tries to keep dangerous drugs off the market and requires companies to back up the claims they make. We certainly don't want them getting in the way of profits.

      July 17, 2011 at 19:32 | Report abuse |
    • Greg

      http://www.naturalnews.com/011401.html

      July 18, 2011 at 02:55 | Report abuse |
  4. Eileen Curras

    This claim that researchers believe they may be a step closer to HIV vaccine is just empty words that do not mean anything to patients with any chronic condition and some accountability has to be set to this proclaim researchers who have kept forgotten a large sector in the community with legislations as the “Pre Existing Condition.” This kind of announcements should be put under control to protect patients.

    July 17, 2011 at 13:03 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Corey

      Yes...we wouldn't want to give them hope, would we? Go back to your cave troll.

      July 17, 2011 at 16:10 | Report abuse |
    • Mark

      Corey, we work with terminally ill patients...they dont empty hope and pretty words, they want answers.

      July 17, 2011 at 18:21 | Report abuse |
  5. Ryan

    "Over the course of six months, five infected monkeys were injected with the vaccine three times, while five others were given a placebo vaccine. After 18 months, it was found that 40% of the vaccinated monkeys had very low to undetectable amounts of virus in their bodies"...so 2 out of 5 monkeys had low to undetectable amounts? I'll be convinced when the sample size is larger.

    July 17, 2011 at 13:27 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Aidan

      No, 40% showing lower infection rates in a group where only 50% were given the drug means 4 out of 5, not 2 out of 5. The other 5 were given a placebo, which means nothing would have changed for them.

      July 17, 2011 at 18:45 | Report abuse |
    • Victor

      Ryan, based on your inability to grasp even a journalists' watered-down interpretation of statistics, it sounds like you would have a hard time being convinced the sun is yellow.

      July 18, 2011 at 06:42 | Report abuse |
    • Setu

      Victor, It is a myth that the Sun's color is yellow. The Sun's color is actually white, but only when the Sun's ray's pass through the earth's atmosphere do the rays 'appear' to change from white to shades of yellow, therefore we perceive it to be 'yellow' colored.

      Its like a yellow colored paper when seen under blue lighting may 'appear' to become 'green'. But just because that paper 'appears' to be green, does its actual color change from yellow to green? NO. LIkewise, the Sun's original color (white) remains even though we on earth perceive it to be 'yellow'

      July 18, 2011 at 14:11 | Report abuse |
    • bob

      setu, the sun's color temperture is roughly 5780k. thats yellow white, not white.

      July 18, 2011 at 16:30 | Report abuse |
  6. Larry051967

    Researchers found out that upon finding a cure the funding stops. New announcement. Cure may be decades off researchers now say.

    July 17, 2011 at 13:28 | Report abuse | Reply
  7. Aaron

    Seems like Dr. Fauci must have been misquoted. Why would he not be anything but supportive of this vaccine that resulted in a cure in animals? Sure it's not the same as humans, but he makes it seem like it will fail in humans. He has no idea – none of us do – until we try. Isn't that what our tax dollars going to research are supposed to be for?

    July 17, 2011 at 14:07 | Report abuse | Reply
    • VRL

      Every quote from Dr. Anthony Fauci is always pessimistic...I don't think I've ever read one positive quote from this man regarding any major news about HIV treatment or vaccine, always, negative...not sure why. Perhaps, he's afraid of losing his job if ever there is a cure...

      July 17, 2011 at 18:34 | Report abuse |
    • Mike

      There's a good reason for every statement by Dr. Fauci to be pessimistic, because frankly, these are pretty unimpressive results. The ability to get a response what is likely a single strain of SIV in a monkey model is insignificant compared with trying to get a reliable response with people for HIV, of which there are thousand/millions of different circulating strains. Trying to make a good vaccine that will provide protection from all possible HIV strains perhaps simply an exercise in futility. I received my PhD in HIV immunology research, and really, this is no big news. Call me when they've done a clinical trial in people and found good protective benefit, until then, I won't be holding my breath.

      July 18, 2011 at 01:45 | Report abuse |
  8. Jules

    People slam research and say they will stop when it's "not profitable???" Do you have ANY idea how many non-profits and universities working toward curing disease at NO PROFIT? Creating vaccines and medicines for your benefit? What about all the countries with government run healthcare who would give anything to find a cure to lower their cost of treatments by billions of dollars – so the governments of these countries all fun research? They would LOSE billions of dollars by denying treatments. No one is holding cures back. Even at a FOR PROFIT a scientist or biochemist would give up their job and take the cure public to win Nobel prize and a million dollars for finding a cure. You think they'd give that up because their boss said so? And you think even a for profit company would give up the PUBLICITY and stock skyrocketing that would come with finding cures?

    July 17, 2011 at 14:10 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Dan

      Thank you. Someone who actually doesn't see conspiracies in everything.

      July 17, 2011 at 17:22 | Report abuse |
    • hehe101

      Dan, not everyone believes everything is a just a conspiracy. Life is not a 1950s spy novel. We can trust everyone, as long as we keep our minds in check and our mouths shut on secrets, everyone is our friend. Our enemies are small. We are the f***** western world. If our scientists are half a second closer to finding a cure for one the most deadliest diseases on earth, then we will be that much closer. That is what we should be focusing on.

      July 17, 2011 at 18:25 | Report abuse |
  9. Jeremiah baughman

    Personally I think instead of testing apes n some what being successful with suppressing the virus. That right there darwins theory of evolution we dont come from monkey nor ape. our blood types never will be identical in anyway shape or form.

    July 17, 2011 at 15:57 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Matt

      I'm pretty sure trying to make sense of your comment just gave me aids.

      July 17, 2011 at 16:02 | Report abuse |
    • Sam

      Words together with periods and spaces and capital letters... durrrrrr

      July 17, 2011 at 16:16 | Report abuse |
    • Daniel

      Durp.

      July 17, 2011 at 17:29 | Report abuse |
    • Whats up doc?

      Not sure if your blind or drunk what was your point??

      July 17, 2011 at 19:01 | Report abuse |
  10. Jema0407

    The problem is this is a small biotech company which probably exists from month to month on what little money they can raise. Even though this is amazing data – it is pre-clinical and investors will not want to take a risk, particularly in this financial environment, on pre-clinical data. The NIH needs to support this research. Tony Fauci, head of NIAID, spends millions on trials that show little potential. Remember the Tai vaccine trial? Everyone came out against that huge, very expensive trial on 2 vaccines that had already failed and Dr. Fauci plowed along with no regard wasting tax payers money then tried to spin the data to look like there was benefit until it was realized it was all b.s. Dr. Fauci needs to be replaced with someone who actually wants to end the AIDS pandemic and who will fund research like this, not line his own pockets and revel in the power his position gives him. Why was he not removed when he was found to be a co-owner of the IL-2 patent, a compound he funneled millions into? Then when data such as this is released, instead of providing the funding needed for it to move forward, Fauci ignores it. The AIDS crisis is costing the world billions – it is time to fund and support cure research such as this and put an end to the madness which has become the AIDS crisis.

    July 17, 2011 at 16:11 | Report abuse | Reply
  11. Ronald Raygun

    too bad they dont spend time on curing neuro degenerative diseases.. MS, ALS, Alzheimers, Parkinsons etc

    July 17, 2011 at 16:12 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Kevin B

      They do.

      July 17, 2011 at 17:06 | Report abuse |
    • HatetheCNNcommentTrolls

      really dude? why dont you try googling for work on cures for those. 1 company CANNOT try to cure them all they just dont have the resources.

      July 17, 2011 at 17:11 | Report abuse |
  12. PZ23

    Best bet for a cure is using antibodies from people with immunity against HIV.

    July 17, 2011 at 16:26 | Report abuse | Reply
    • hehe101

      I learned in health that white (and mean EUROPEAN) people have a gene that makes them resistant towards some STI. I learned this in the middle of the south, so who knows?

      July 17, 2011 at 18:28 | Report abuse |
    • DCMichael

      Wow, as easy as that. Wonder why no one ever thought of that before...they should have asked you first.

      July 17, 2011 at 18:28 | Report abuse |
    • MikeLong

      Pretty sure that has to do with not having the "appropriate" viral antigen receptors on human T-cells... virus can't dock...no mo AIDS son! Just give all the new embryos gene therapy. Seems easy if the government (welfare) will pay for it.

      July 17, 2011 at 20:19 | Report abuse |
  13. Jim

    Dear conspiracy theorists, with all due respect (it ain't much!) you just don't make sense. Hiding a known AIDS vaccine so people can make more money is a great conspiracy, but not a real idea. Think about it, people must be alive to purchase things. I hate to break it to you, but there's nobody that's buying drugs when they're dead. A much better theory is that there's a cure for a non-fatal disease that's being withheld. When you guys have your next big "Let's Make Up Conspiracies" meeting, try suggesting that one to the group.

    July 17, 2011 at 16:44 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Tony

      People on HIV meds have nearly as long a life as hiv- people... Selling drugs to those people for 60 or 70 years is going to make more of a profit than a one-off cure.

      July 18, 2011 at 14:34 | Report abuse |
  14. Dennis

    There will never be a cure or vaccine for HIV for the simple reason that the infectious AIDS model is wrong.

    July 17, 2011 at 17:12 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Dan

      How so? I'm interested in what you mean.

      July 17, 2011 at 17:25 | Report abuse |
  15. Kevininvancouver

    I don't they will never cure HIV – the most we can hope for is to treat it effectively.

    July 17, 2011 at 17:15 | Report abuse | Reply
    • cpc65

      That may be the scary truth. A "cure" would possibly be a one shot deal, where ongoing "treatments" to keep the disease in check could last the patient's lifetime. The later means WAY more $$$ to be raked in by the pharmaceutical companies and that's what their shareholders demand most.

      July 17, 2011 at 17:49 | Report abuse |
  16. Daniel

    You must be one of those "spreading God's love", religious types. Thanks for strengthening my non-belief.

    July 17, 2011 at 17:31 | Report abuse | Reply
  17. Nah

    daniel: "You must be one of those "spreading God's love", religious types. Thanks for strengthening my non-belief."

    So "brako" makes a trolling statement that had nothing to do with religion, you interpreted to be an expression of his religious beliefs, and, because you don't like his beliefs (that you gave him), you therefore feel strengthened in your entire rejection of "faith" altogether.

    Brilliant logic.

    July 17, 2011 at 17:37 | Report abuse | Reply
  18. Curious Borg

    If you restore the immune system, they will live as long as they should. It is the immune system that is ridding the body of virus after vaccination in the first place. Antibodies are good, not bad. Memory cells are good, not bad.

    July 17, 2011 at 17:37 | Report abuse | Reply
    • phil

      My wife has a cousin who has, what could be considered the opposite of AIDS. Her immune system is way over active - and it doesn't differentiate between an invasive cell or one of it's own. Too much of a good thing CAN actually be bad. She's constantly sick because her body is attacking itself.

      July 17, 2011 at 18:37 | Report abuse |
  19. cpc65

    “We are well on the path to a functional cure, at least in monkeys,” – Good for them monkeys! Soon they can rise up and become our masters. Hey! That sounds like a great idea for a book and / or movie!

    July 17, 2011 at 17:42 | Report abuse | Reply
  20. DCMichael

    Too bad they won't ever find a cure for ignorance and bigotry...

    July 17, 2011 at 18:30 | Report abuse | Reply
  21. HRPufnstuf

    What is "closer to reality"? They either have it or they don't.

    July 17, 2011 at 18:30 | Report abuse | Reply
    • phil

      It means they're closer than they were... It's really not that hard to understand. What they have shows promise to finding perhaps a permanent solution.

      July 17, 2011 at 18:35 | Report abuse |
  22. hehe101

    I could say the same about your kind of people, and that would cure over population! Way more gay hating peeps than gays, so who hoo!

    July 17, 2011 at 18:32 | Report abuse | Reply
  23. yo yo ma

    Can someone explain to me why a placebo needs to be given?

    July 17, 2011 at 18:33 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Aidan

      In any scientific experiment there has to be a control group that has nothing changed. It's how you create a comparison and show how effective a drug is. While it seems highly unlikely, the mere possibility that some other aspect of the monkeys' environment was causing the lowered rates, and not the drug, would negate the evidence. This way, the scientists can say "Look, the control group still has high rates but those that took the drug have low rates," which is a way of proving that the drug is the reason for the lower rates.

      Without a control group it would be too easy for pessimists to say "Maybe they just got better because they have some gene that destroyed the virus coincidentally at the same time that they were given drugs" and dismiss the research. While that seems somewhat ludicrous to the layman, that's how all scientific research is performed. They have to prove 100% that the drug is responsible.

      July 17, 2011 at 18:53 | Report abuse |
  24. NoPunIntended

    Whoever wrote this article obviously does not understand the distinction between a vaccine and a cure. A vaccine is not a cure, and a cure is not a vaccine.

    July 17, 2011 at 18:38 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Aidan

      That's what I was thinking. Vaccines are usually tested on high risk groups who are not yet infected as they are intended to prevent infection, not cure it. You are right that this article seems confused with the terminology.

      July 17, 2011 at 18:56 | Report abuse |
  25. phil

    Keep waiting for your delivery, troll. You've been saying "it'll be delivered tomorrow" for weeks.

    July 17, 2011 at 18:43 | Report abuse | Reply
  26. Charles

    Conspiracy theory or not, the financial ramifications of a "cure" versus a "treatment" are huge. Curing a disease eliminates the disease and the money making potential of on going treatment for the disease. Make no mistake, pharmaceutical corporations are in the business of making money, not cures. Billions of dollars have been spent on disease research. When was the last time you actually heard of a "cure" for a disease? Forcing people to live longer with their diseases is extremely profitable.

    July 17, 2011 at 18:44 | Report abuse | Reply
    • jason

      Smallpox. Look it up. The last case of it was in Africa in I think the 60s or 70s. The vaccine was widely distributed and the disease was exterpated, through the work of Jenner (a white guy, damn those evil white people) and the World Health Organization (damn those white scientists). Smallpox used to be an enormous epidemic, killing millions of Africans every year. It far surpassed hiv in deaths.

      July 17, 2011 at 19:24 | Report abuse |
    • joe

      and coincidently HIV/AIDS IMMMEDIATELY popped up in Africa with the disappearance of smallpox. In fact many of the Africans who received smallpox vaccinations ended up with HIV. Imagine that!

      July 17, 2011 at 19:40 | Report abuse |
    • A scientist

      How about antibiotics? Most are cheap, given for a short period of time, and cure infection.

      Or Phenylketonuria, a disease that leads to progressive neurological degradation if untreated (something that would presumably make the health care industry lost of money). Now, simple tests allow it to be cause shortly after birth. It can be treated with simple diet changes (which make the health care industry absolutely no money). The same is true for all of the diseases in this class (aminoacidopathies).

      Or peptic (stomach) ulcers. Treatment used to be very expensive and protracted, but now most can now be cured with simple antibiotic treatment.

      July 18, 2011 at 12:46 | Report abuse |
  27. mj

    its news like this that gives me faith in the human spirit, here are scientists who have dedicated their lives to save others, I applaud them and the work they do.... But then again I read the comments on here like, 'cure all but the gays' and I'm reminded of the other side of the human spirit, and well I realize how low and dark humanity can get...

    July 17, 2011 at 19:13 | Report abuse | Reply
  28. Perry Medkit

    I just hope there on to something, as a paramedic in my 23 year I've responded to countless shootings and motor vehicle accidents and knowing a cheap pair of rubber gloves is my only protection can make you a little nervous.

    July 17, 2011 at 19:15 | Report abuse | Reply
  29. MJMullinII

    Reading the story, it puts me in mind of the Rabies Vaccine - in that you take it when you suspect infection, not just as a normal course.

    Looking at how Rabies deaths have been all but eliminated, I'd say it's a pretty good course of action.

    July 17, 2011 at 19:17 | Report abuse | Reply
  30. jason

    Scary thing is that all of the developed (aka "white" and asian) world are experiencing population declines, while Africa is contributing to almost all the world's population growth. They can't even feed themselves, and yet they are popping out children left and right. They don't plan for the future and they don't have any sense– that is why their plight is going to get worse and worse and worse. No doubt, the international (aka "white" and asian) community is going to have to rescue them from their own problems and probably take in millions of those parasites.

    July 17, 2011 at 19:22 | Report abuse | Reply
    • joe

      lol. you make the case that hiv is not a natural occurrence much better than i ever could

      July 17, 2011 at 19:43 | Report abuse |
  31. Dave

    Then, I'll make a religious statement: religious interference with the CDC in the early years allowed HIV to gain a much faster foothold in the US that it would have otherwise managed. If not for the heroic administrators disobeying the White House and secretly diverting funds to what were effective covert public health activities, we'd be even worse off.

    July 17, 2011 at 19:39 | Report abuse | Reply
  32. Tron

    How is this progress for an AIDS vaccine? Humans are not susceptible to SIV so attenuating it doesn't mean anything to us. So they've cured SIV in monkey's...that's great, i guess, but it has nothing to do with HIV in people.

    July 17, 2011 at 22:34 | Report abuse | Reply
    • mike

      your lack of biological knowledge of viruses and the immune system really show!

      July 18, 2011 at 15:04 | Report abuse |
  33. Ken

    It is about time we find vaccine that will get rid of HIV. I am so glad that we are a step closer. How many years already? If it wasn't the greed of the pharmaceutical companies, we would probably find one by now. I guess they rather sell anti-viral medicine on a long term basis for more dollars than just one-time vaccine. By the way, for those trying to justify AIDS and over population. You are sick. It is not humane and unacceptable to deprive someone the chance to live as healthy as everyone else. I wonder how you would think about it if you are the one that has the virus or cancer, would you want to given a chance to live? Stop being selfish and ignorant. The fact that you care about earth and the use of its resources, doesn't make you a better being. In fact, we are part of the universe, every living thing, including human and earth are all in it together. The only thing we can control over-population is to educate people to limit their births, not to let people who already live suffer and die. If you truly care about mother Earth and your environment, start by limiting the resources you use yourself and help educating others around you to live responsibly. Get rid of your gas guzzling SUV, don't use plastic bag, stop buying bottled water, eat less, etc.

    July 17, 2011 at 23:23 | Report abuse | Reply
  34. LOL!

    Pffft! This sounds oddly like a certain sci-fi movie/novel franchise I know of. Cough cough Planet of the Apes, cough cough. And we all know how that one went.

    July 18, 2011 at 02:22 | Report abuse | Reply
  35. Daniel Y

    The whole world is going down the drain. There will never be a cure because of the money hungry corporations. I bet there is a cure but "big brother" wont give relief. I hate this world. A doctor told me that herpes 1 is common. This whole world sucks!

    July 18, 2011 at 02:36 | Report abuse | Reply
  36. Surgical-blog

    yes Bob i do agree with you on the cost of treating HIV. one thing i want to add here is that, i think that may be pharma companies have develop the vaccine but they are not getting it out, all they do is to wait and lunch initial treatments to earn.
    i have also explain this in a post on my blog http://www.surgical-blog.com/ i am not given the link here because webmaster of this blog will consider my comment as spam

    July 18, 2011 at 05:13 | Report abuse | Reply
  37. Common Sense

    Not everyone can get HIV so I'm not worried about some lesser primate plague.Northern Europeans carry a recessive trait that makes them immune to HIV or have higher resistance with just one copy.

    July 18, 2011 at 08:35 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Hello

      That is only true for about 1% of "Northern Europeans." 1%.

      July 19, 2011 at 03:00 | Report abuse |
  38. Amber

    Can we please get a stupidity vaccine?

    July 18, 2011 at 12:10 | Report abuse | Reply
  39. I NEED HIV CURE PLEASE

    if this will been possible this year or next year and i will be the most happiest person on health please a funtional cure but i wish i was a doct

    July 18, 2011 at 13:51 | Report abuse | Reply
  40. mike

    This is NOT a cure for HIV. A vaccine is a preventative measure for individuals not currently infected with a viral or bacterial disease. It seems many people not in the scientific fields does not know the difference between vaccines, cures and treatments. A cure is something that completely rids the individual of the disease. A treatment improves the quality of the individuals life by releiving them of the diseases symptoms or slowing the progress of the disease. A vaccine is injecting the individual with a whole or partial protein on the outside of the infectious agent, one which your immune system recognizes already. Your bodies immune system has a memory system that allows it to remember that antigen (foreign protein) that has entered the body. So the next time that infectious agent comes in contact with your bodies immune system it already has the system in place to immediately destroy it. At any rate this is a very difficult vaccine to produce because the way HIV works as a virus and the way vaccines work conflict as well as HIV being a retrovirus mutates at higher rates.

    July 18, 2011 at 15:02 | Report abuse | Reply
  41. George of the Jungle

    Aren't placebos so that the subject doesn't know if they received the actual vaccine or not–to see what part of the treatment was influenced by wishful thinking? It's no surprise that 40% had 'very low undetectable amounts of the virus in their body'. I'd be shocked by the monkeys' intelligence if that number was anything more than 50%.

    July 18, 2011 at 16:18 | Report abuse | Reply
  42. Rob

    Poor animals.

    July 19, 2011 at 09:10 | Report abuse | Reply
  43. K 110

    I am not agree with brako as you know that women are the very most controbiuter to cullamity of slping game play with their household so the caring most be to the children and men, becouse men is like giving food to hungry some one. so some way some how women look for men.

    July 20, 2011 at 03:54 | Report abuse | Reply
  44. Scarborougha Armbrustd

    Hello there, You have done a great job. I’ll definitely digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I'm sure they will be benefited from this site.

    July 26, 2012 at 13:11 | Report abuse | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Advertisement
About this blog

Get a behind-the-scenes look at the latest stories from CNN Chief Medical Correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen and the CNN Medical Unit producers. They'll share news and views on health and medical trends - info that will help you take better care of yourself and the people you love.