home
RSS
Can a fat protect you from diabetes?
December 20th, 2010
05:01 PM ET

Can a fat protect you from diabetes?

For those trying to eat a healthy diet, whole-fat dairy and trans fats are usually not on the menu — at least, not yet. Scientists have narrowed in on a trans fat component found mainly in dairy fat that may ward off type 2 diabetes and protect cardiovascular health. While the research is far from conclusive and requires much further study, it suggests fats may play a more complex role in human health than previously thought.

Researchers found that adults with high levels of a fatty acid (one of the main parts of fat molecules) called trans-palmitoleic acid in their blood had a three-fold lower risk for diabetes, according to a study published Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine. This naturally produced trans fat component is found mainly in dairy, as well as some meats. These subjects also had lower body fat, higher good cholesterol levels, and lower triglyceride levels, which are all associated with better cardiovascular well-being.

“It’s exciting because traditionally fats were just seen as artery cloggers, but they seem to be both harmful and protective,” said lead author and Harvard epidemiologist Dariush Mozaffarian. “The fatty acid world is becoming more interesting and complex.”

Little is known about trans-palmitoleic acid. In a 1970 study, nutritionists found it comprised only 0.2 percent of all dairy fats. Mammals actually don’t produce it naturally. Bacteria found in cattle make the fatty acid during digestion, and it eventually finds its way to their milk.

Mozaffarian and his colleagues grew interested in the fatty acid after examining a small body of evidence linking dairy consumption with lower diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk factors. “Because trans-palmitoleic acid is fairly unique to dairy, we knew if we found it in subjects there’s a good chance it came from eating some dairy product,” he said.

Analyzing blood samples and lifestyles of more than 3,700 adults 65 years or older, Mozzaffarian found that even when adjusting for various demographic and lifestyle differences, subjects with high levels of trans-palmitoleic acid or reported eating whole-fat dairy appeared to be in better shape than those who didn't. 739 people in the study had trans-palmitoleic acid at the highest protective level.  The acid was found in each person studied.

“This one of the strongest confirmations that there’s something in dairy fat that lowers risk of diabetes,” Mozzaffarian said.

That doesn’t mean you should put down the skim milk and reach for the half and half, however. Excess calories can lead to weight gain which, going unchecked, is a contributing factor in diabetes, heart disease and a number of other health problems.  This is only one study that does not show trans-palmitoleic acid or whole-fat dairy directly caused these differences. However, it's widely accepted that diets high in the saturated fats found in dairy products often lead to diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

“We certainly know that eating a lot of saturated fat is associated with some bad consequences,” said American Diabetes Association Senior Vice President of Medical Affairs and Community Information Dr. Sue Kirkman. “This study is interesting, but people shouldn't conclude they should eat or drink high fat dairy products. It does, however, generate a great hypothesis for future study.”

Mozaffarian agrees. He hopes others will look further at trans-palmitoleic acid and it’s effects in the body. If trans-palmitoleic acid is found to guard against diabetes or cardiovascular disease, he envisions that maybe manufacturers can increase its concentration in dairy products or use it as a supplement.

“It's exciting because it might be able to reduce the epidemic of diabetes across the whole world,” Mozaffarian said. “But this is really new science, so we don’t want to oversell this. It could be a flash in a pan that turns out to not be correct.”


soundoff (73 Responses)
  1. Lincoln Brigham

    Eventually, with enough study, the field of nutrition will return to the year 1970 before they accepted the mantra "fat is bad."

    Yeah, that's progress.

    December 20, 2010 at 17:08 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Bryon

      Well said.
      Stupid people...food that has been around, including SATURATED fat, for thousands of years IS NOT A PROBLEM.

      December 21, 2010 at 12:15 | Report abuse |
  2. BoB Boise

    This could be a reason why the DASH diet protected against high blood pressure, too. Goes to show physicians are about 50 years behind the research curve in nutrition. Consuming Fat does not cause heart disease or diabetis; it is refined carbs that kill. Stop eating processed foods filled with sugar and starch. "Low Fat" processed foods will kill you!

    December 20, 2010 at 17:53 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Dan

      Preach the good word!

      December 21, 2010 at 00:25 | Report abuse |
  3. BoB Boise

    which is more damaging for the pancreas: processing sugar or processing protein/fat (if you are part of the 70% of population which is insulin resistant? Yet doctors and American Diabetic Assoc has kept pushing carbs. Just look at the evil food pyramid. Pushed by Animal Rights Terrorists and wheat growers.

    December 20, 2010 at 17:56 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Kim

      Exactly! It's no small wonder that Americans started getting fat not long after the food pyramid was implemented.

      December 20, 2010 at 20:24 | Report abuse |
    • fronius

      Obesity and diabetes are less common in vegetarians. Apparently fresh fruit, vegetables, and whole grains aren't all bad. Sugar and processed foodss are bad whether you eat animals or not.

      December 20, 2010 at 20:38 | Report abuse |
    • A Physiologist

      BoB – just a quick reality check – the pancreas itself doesn't process fats, sugars or proteins, it just releases digestive enzymes into the lumen of the duodenum when these nutrients are present. Since the same stimuli (acetylcholine and CCK) release all of these enzymes, it really doesn't matter what dietary nutrients trigger the response and none could possibly damage the pancreas in the way you are suggesting. However, the source of this myth is that the pancreas can indeed be damaged by its own digestive enzymes in pathophysiological conditions like cystic fibrosis, when the enzymes are prevented from passing through the pancreatic ducts because they are blocked by a "sticky mucus". In a normal person this isn't an issue and it NEVER happens. Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story – there's always a conspiracy by some special interest group at the bottom of every problem – right?

      December 21, 2010 at 02:57 | Report abuse |
    • Melanie

      I don't get how the ADA can push so many carbs on a type 2 (like me). The minute I significantly lowered my carbs, my sugars went down. They spout 20-30 MG per meal, I eat no more than 5-10. Go figure!

      December 21, 2010 at 03:34 | Report abuse |
    • abbyful

      fronius,
      Probably becuase a strict vegetarian/vegan diet makes it difficult to eat McDonalds every meal. Trying to compare vegetarians to the average person is comparing apples to oranges, you're comparing a group that watches what they eat very carefully to a group that many of the members eat utter junk. It's like trying to compare runners against everyone else regardless if "everyone else" exercises or not; of course you'll conclude "running is the best form of exercise, because the runners were healthier than the other people".

      Eating a balanced omnivorous diet and not overeating will lower your risk of obesity and diabetes too.

      December 21, 2010 at 10:21 | Report abuse |
    • Fawn

      I believe the physiologist is a little confused. BOB wasn't referring to the pancreas' digestive impact, rather it's responsibility (for beta cells in the islets of langherhans) in producing and release of insulin and issues with over-producing insulin due to insulin resistance, etc.

      December 21, 2010 at 10:31 | Report abuse |
  4. Julien

    The problem I have with these studies is that the scientific/health community would constantly come out with contradicting pieces of -fat is good one moment and bad the next; this sort of diet is great one moment and bad the next; eating blah is great, then, the next year, the same blah is bad for you. No one knows what to believe anymore. EXtremely frustrating. I almost with they would just stop coming out with these new findings, or maybe limit them to scienctific or health magazines so the general public wouldn't be so confused. I know I am...

    December 20, 2010 at 18:14 | Report abuse | Reply
    • jodi budding

      I agree with you julien it is very confusing when they change every year

      December 20, 2010 at 22:11 | Report abuse |
    • lorne

      couldn't agree with you more. i'm 66, type 2 for about 15 years (that i know of). i read everything on the subject and it truly seems that no one really and truly knows what they are talking about because of your point. today this good for you, tomorrow not so good. FRUSTRATING!

      December 21, 2010 at 01:09 | Report abuse |
    • Michael

      You really need to watch where these studies are coming from. Most of the ones in the US are run by drug companies and can't really be trusted. Many from Sweden are pretty good, and those tend to all refute the "fat is bad" nutrition guide of the last few decades. Is it a coincidence that the rate of diabbetes has skyrocketed since scientists told us to stop drinking whole milk and cream? Maybe not...

      Also this article contradicts the study. Saying that excess calories from fat leads to weight gain goes directly against the study that said people who drink whole milk "had lower body fat." Come on. I am quoting your own article...

      December 21, 2010 at 15:34 | Report abuse |
  5. Joe

    Everything in moderation. Always was true, always will be.

    December 20, 2010 at 18:21 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Squeeker

      Exactly! Eat A LITTLE bit of EVERYTHING and get off the sofa and get some exercise – it's that simple, but people continually want to make more of it than that or try to find an easier way out of the American "Fat Fiasco"... use some common sense people!

      December 20, 2010 at 21:58 | Report abuse |
    • mcccccccc

      Poison in moderation is still poison.

      December 21, 2010 at 00:20 | Report abuse |
    • Mike

      mcccccccc:

      You are wrong.

      Oxygen, H2O, and just about ANY substance necessary to human life is considered poisonous at high enough levels.

      A more accurate statement would be "NOTHING is poisonous in low enough doses"

      December 21, 2010 at 00:57 | Report abuse |
    • lorne

      willpower works for saints, not for sinners like me. i cheat (diabetics will know what i mean).

      December 21, 2010 at 01:11 | Report abuse |
    • islandboy808

      You do know mcccccccc that in medieval days of Europe kings and noblemen would take poison in small doses. Why? ... Because it made them IMMUNE to those same or similar poisons in higher dosages. So moderation does apply there.

      December 21, 2010 at 01:41 | Report abuse |
  6. jerry

    could it be a certain combination of these foods in your diet helping people ??? could it be dairy producers and certain others pushing this to make $$$$$$$$$$$$

    December 20, 2010 at 18:37 | Report abuse | Reply
    • drsolo

      You are absolutely correct, it is important to know who is funding the research.

      December 21, 2010 at 08:07 | Report abuse |
  7. Jason

    Hasn't this always been known? How has this just been "discovered"? Without fat, we would all die! Come on now. Everything in moderation. Low and non-fat items are a product of greedy people trying to make more money without killing us in the near term. Eat full fat items in moderation. They taste so much better, and as "so recently discovered", are good for you too.

    December 20, 2010 at 19:00 | Report abuse | Reply
    • drsolo

      "Hasn't this always been known? How has this just been "discovered"? Without fat, we would all die!"
      True. Every cell is made out of lipids (fats) and strengthened with cholesterol.

      December 21, 2010 at 08:10 | Report abuse |
  8. hebbar

    I will tell you something very simple to "insure" yourself against dicease. Yoga everyday for one hour. Of course this is free and does not have a copay nor waiting time nor any RISK factor and crap.

    December 20, 2010 at 19:11 | Report abuse | Reply
    • tom

      where did you go to medical school?

      December 21, 2010 at 00:46 | Report abuse |
  9. scott

    read The China Study that will give you all the information you need on nutrition.

    December 20, 2010 at 19:28 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Kevin

      Yes, read the China study, then do some homework and realize that it used manipulated data to argue for a preconceived idealistic notion of vegetarian. Compare the rate of heart disease and obesity before and after its findings were accepted. Then put it in the trash where it belongs.

      December 20, 2010 at 19:43 | Report abuse |
    • abbyful

      The conclusions drawn in the book "The China Study" are not the conclusions of the actual study.

      December 21, 2010 at 10:27 | Report abuse |
  10. Curt

    HURRY UP SCIENTISTS FIGURE IT OUT IF YOUR ALL SO DAMN SMART.

    December 20, 2010 at 20:17 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Metropl

      Yeah, scientists. You keep throwing logic, education and the scientific method in our faces. Stupid scientists and your throughtful reflection coupled with expiramentation. Shut your mouths.

      December 20, 2010 at 21:50 | Report abuse |
    • islandboy808

      Well scientists do find things everyday (some useful and some not). The reason why it is contradictory is because they all "work alone" (I mean in separate colleges; on top of separate labs) they "don't exactly collaborate" when they put out results. Not only that they are put on the spot to find results so they will pump out the newest result as fast as possible (without further testing or verification). Why are they put on the spot?... It is because they need grants to fund themselves and the next line of research. So if they do not produce something amazing or even "something," their research money is cut. This is bad for the scientist and his or her reputation. And thus you have this random crap being put out. I don't blame the scientist so much as the news writers who bring this journal publication to the public. The news writers should understand that this just a recent find and not something consistently proven to be true. So if you want to take your fustration out on someone it should be the one who wrote this article.

      December 21, 2010 at 01:58 | Report abuse |
    • drsolo

      Actually, scientists dont and cant afford to work "alone". They must communicate with each other as this is an essential part of the scientific method. Science progresses in small increments. It is mainstream journalists who jump on information, mangle and misinterpret what they read often to get headlines. Physicians are not scientists, BTW and their recommendations are generally based on tradition which is inherently conservative and rarely challenged beliefs. As somebody else suggested, who funds specific research can be extremely important. "Follow the money" applies.

      December 21, 2010 at 08:03 | Report abuse |
  11. ramrod

    Stop publishing health information that extends life. Old people use up the Social Security Fund that I will need.
    Hurry up people, eat more processed food and sugars.

    December 20, 2010 at 20:28 | Report abuse | Reply
  12. carolinago

    Here's a health tip you will never learn from these "studies": stay away from the processed food. They load it up with sugars, salt, and unnatural fats to make it taste better after sitting on a shelf. Bake using honey, season your own food, and stick to using natural fats in your cooking (this includes rendered animal fat; people ate it for thousands of years and our bodies are used to digesting it). It's a lot easier than you think to cut down, and it doesn't require slaving away all day in the kitchen either 🙂

    December 20, 2010 at 20:35 | Report abuse | Reply
    • lorne

      you are not correct about honey because a molecule of sugar is a molecule of sugar. honey is sugar with maybe some vitamins or minerals that the bees throw into it. i know some people who agree with you and use more honey than necessary thinking that it is OK for them.

      December 21, 2010 at 01:18 | Report abuse |
    • Melanie

      Love, Love, Love your response. McD's and those other places are killing us. There's no need for it. I always shop on the outside of the aisles for food – the inner aisles are just crap.

      December 21, 2010 at 03:38 | Report abuse |
  13. spar10

    My parents were raised on fats like butter, lard and whole milk. They were big meat and potatoes eaters, too. They were very slender adults and both of them developed Type II diabetes in their fifties.

    December 20, 2010 at 20:39 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Demosthenes Locke

      Yes, they developed Type II diabetes in their 50's, after the Food Pyramid came out, their doctors got all over them about cholesterol, made them change their diets, and put them on Lipitor. Now they're unhealthy, their cholesterol is through the roof, they've lost half their memory, they're looking at potential insulin dependence, and they hate the plastic-and-cardboard crap the doctors and "nutritionists" make them eat.

      I went through the same thing. I was FINE. My cholesterol was so good, my doctor wanted it herself. The total was high, but the HDL/LDL balance was EXCELLENT. Then I went to a cardiologist and he panicked, and told me it was all TOO HIGH, and wanted to put me on statins, change my diet. So I did. Then I had an accident, had surgery, developed Type II as a post-surgical complication. So the diabetes coaches and nutritionists put the fear of God in me about my diet, and I changed it even more, cutting out all the fat and cholesterol. My numbers, instead of going down, went UP, and the balance went to hell. I gained 50 pounds, even eating the "healthy" crud they told me to. Finally, my cardiologist wanted me to go on Dean Ornish's diet. I told him to stuff it.

      I went back to eating real bacon, real eggs, whole milk and cheese, cut almost all the sugar, most of the refined carbs, try to stick to complex carbs. My A1C dropped from 9 to 5.5. I've lost that 50 pounds. My cholesterol is improving, and one doctor says the HDL/triglyceride balance is excellent. In other words, I went back to a diet my grandparents would have eaten, and I'm FINE. My glucose is even under control, if I don't cheat and eat something sweet. I stay away from sugar and don't snack after 10, my fasting level is under 115-130.

      And above all, I don't listen to the ADA and their idiocy regarding carbs. The last thing you feed a diabetic is carbohydrates. That's like tugging on Superman's cape - dumb.

      December 21, 2010 at 10:13 | Report abuse |
  14. falkentyne

    All people have to do is simply do what the Father of modern nutrition, Jack LaLanne did:
    "If man makes it, don't eat it". And exercise.

    THAT'S ALL YOU NEED TO DO.
    If it's manmade, don't eat it.
    If it's nature made, eat it in moderation.

    And work out.
    You do this, YOU WILL NOT BE FAT and your chances of getting cancer or heart disease (that's not genetic) are MUCH reduced.

    December 20, 2010 at 20:43 | Report abuse | Reply
  15. Ken

    Yes you can. Tell them to start eating healthy and exercise more often. Maybe then they'll lose some weight and stop being a huge burden on the health care system.

    December 20, 2010 at 21:22 | Report abuse | Reply
  16. Luis

    I always thought it was funny that parents were told to give babies whole-fat milk but to not drink it themselves. What's good for the goose, right?

    December 20, 2010 at 22:19 | Report abuse | Reply
  17. ChipH

    "3,700 adults enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study. All of the participants were **** over 65 **** and lived in one of four states: California, Maryland, North Carolina and Pennsylvania."

    THEY WERE ALL OVER 65!! In other words, they WEREN'T CANDIDATES FOR EARLY ONSET DIABETES, ANYWAYS!!

    This is one thing you can do to protect your family. DON'T BUY FOODS WITH HFCS!
    'Robertshealthfoods.com/index.php?topic=Food'

    They were NEVER EXPOSED TO HFCS as kids, the MAIN CAUSE of T2D, and HIGHLY unlikely they drink milk at that age.

    Butter and (real) cheese are two of the most expensive items in the grocery store.

    "CONTAINS: HFCS and/or cane sugar." That tells you everything you need to know. HFCS contains MERCURY and goes
    IMMEDIATELY to the PANCREAS where it DESTROYS INSULIN CELLS.

    Where are the studies approving this ARTIFICIAL HFCS SUBSTANCE for use as a FOOD PRODUCT? THERE WERE NONE!!

    December 20, 2010 at 22:33 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Glenn

      high fructose corn syrup is basically half glucose and half fructose. Honey is basically half glucose and half fructose. Table sugar, once a little digestion takes place in the gut is, guess what, half glucose and half fructose. HFCS is a scapegoat for overeating, IMO.

      December 21, 2010 at 00:10 | Report abuse |
    • Lasciel

      And, yet the body treats HFCS differently.

      Rats given a sugar solution and different rats given a HFCS solution will consume more HFCS than sugar. (Princeton study 2010)

      December 21, 2010 at 11:48 | Report abuse |
  18. Glenn

    They show correlation but not causation. I'd like to see more data. It could be that the lucky subjects have a metabolism that both prevents the quick breakdown of this fatty acid as well as protects them from diabetes.

    December 21, 2010 at 00:06 | Report abuse | Reply
  19. Robert

    It seems to me that the media and the medical industry really wants us all dead. This country is now at 29th place for "health". Of course, we SPEND a great deal more than anyone else. Study after study we're paying for as the increasing the obscene poverty rate of is 40% of us – and virtually all of the studies say "We need another study". Turn on the tube and you hear "Ask your doctor if this drug is good for you". Turn to news and you get "another miracle drug", or "diabetes is at epidemic rates in the poor" "the poor are the most obesity" "the poor are taking the most prescriptions drugs". What's wrong with this picture?

    December 21, 2010 at 01:15 | Report abuse | Reply
  20. lorne

    you're just being sarcastic, right? i say again- right???

    December 21, 2010 at 01:15 | Report abuse | Reply
  21. Tammy

    I got rid of stretch marks after weight gain by abrading top layer of the skin http://www.medicalcrystals.com

    December 21, 2010 at 01:21 | Report abuse | Reply
  22. jessicawat

    I joined this website "123 Get Samples" and i got freestuff from it, it took about a week for me to receive? something i actually wanted so just join them and it is easy and free

    December 21, 2010 at 01:41 | Report abuse | Reply
  23. Myshkin

    This is why I stick to the "s*** my grandfather ate" diet. Gravy with nearly every meal, and he still lived to be 94.

    December 21, 2010 at 01:46 | Report abuse | Reply
  24. james gibb

    Listen I watched an old guy spend 10am to 12 pm in a pub with nothing but a chips in a roll about 4-5pm then back for more beer for 20 years he has being doing this, the guys 85 and has been in the pub all his life, my parents tell me. still alive no special pills or rubbish just ALE?. maybe his booze flushes all the chemicals out and his smoking in bars for years stopped limited the CO2 intake, co2 air is the thing that that causes free radicals that kills your cells. Im on this guys track. Beer and tavern breezes all the way.

    December 21, 2010 at 02:03 | Report abuse | Reply
  25. james gibb

    If you want cheap way to get all your daily vitamins without spending $$$ buy Ovaltine drink mix. 6 tsp gives you your daily amount of everything you need. using it daily the 3 bucks Ovaltine should last 4 weeks supplement, antioxidants and all. Look at the label next time your in store http://www.ovaltineusa.com/HealthAndNutrition.aspx

    December 21, 2010 at 02:12 | Report abuse | Reply
  26. helenecha

    It may probably protect people from diabetes if we can make it a rule to keep a little bit feelings of getting hungry with our daily life.

    December 21, 2010 at 04:19 | Report abuse | Reply
  27. drsolo

    Healthy food is what our far distant ancestors evolved to eat. Fresh meat, veggies, fruit. Nothing processed. And if this country wants to get serious about obesity they need to ban all the commercials on TV for processed foods.

    December 21, 2010 at 08:19 | Report abuse | Reply
  28. Big Bear

    A Physiologist?

    Not a Physiologist but a Nurse and Surgical assistant with a high concentration in A&P, Chemistry and Bio. Just a quick reality check back at you. I agree when you say the Pancreas does not "process" fats, proteins etc. (directly).

    Bob made a mistake most non-professionals make. However, he does have merit in what he says as his contention does have basis and is centered around Insulin Resistance.

    Additionally, your statement: "the pancreas itself doesn't process fats, sugars or proteins, it just releases digestive enzymes into the lumen of the duodenum when these nutrients are present" is extremely myopic and horribly incomplete analysis, making Bob Boise's statement far more meaningful than that of what you have cited.

    The summarize, when sugars, carbohydrates, and other sources are in your blood stream it is the function of the Pancreas which produces beta cells in the Islets of Langerhans, thus stimulating the production of insulin to neutralize the sugars,carbohydrates.

    In contrast your statement about enzyme is much further off track than Bob's Physiology, since digestive enzymes are located in the oral, stomach and small intestine regions. You might want to test that "A Physiologist" label before submitting it for public consumption.

    December 21, 2010 at 10:04 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Fawn

      Well said, many thanks! I posted something along the same vein under the BOB comment.

      December 21, 2010 at 10:41 | Report abuse |
  29. razzlea

    http://razzlea.blogspot.com/

    December 21, 2010 at 10:31 | Report abuse | Reply
  30. Rob

    It's great to see research being done on lipids. The nutritional mainstream has really destroyed the value of fats in the public consciousness over the last 30-40 years, which is truly unfortunate. The different ways in which various fats are processed by and benefit the human body is pretty amazing. Not to mention the gross dietary uses of fats as a buffer for blood sugar spikes and as a tool for inducing relatively long-term satiety. I hope that more research like this begins to change the minds of the general public away from thinking of fats as just "BAD" and that people begin to assess the different types of fats they consume and how they affect their bodies. Just like people are now familiar with the concept of "simple" and "complex" carbohydrates, hopefully over the next decade the general public will become more educated about various fats and grow more discerning in their choices of lipids.

    Rational, effective nutrition for fat loss and long-term health: http://www.NutritionPerfected.com/np-blog.html

    December 21, 2010 at 10:54 | Report abuse | Reply
  31. Jim

    Good Calories, Bad Calories by Gary Taubes. Everything you need to know.

    Too bad most nutritionists are too dense to understand it...

    December 21, 2010 at 12:15 | Report abuse | Reply
    • abbyful

      I can't remember if I read this in "Real Food" by Nina Planck or "In Defense of Food" by Michael Pollan, but in one of those books, the author is talking to a researcher or doctor; and they wouldn't stand up for their conclusion about the current advice being wrong. Why? Because it would essentailly be the end of their career. So there are doctors, researchers, nutritionists, and other experts out there that KNOW the current information is off-base, but they are all to worried about fitting in with the status-quo of information to push their findings.

      I find that rather sad. The American public has been grossly misled on what is "healthy", but very few of the experts are willing to speak up.

      December 21, 2010 at 14:00 | Report abuse |
  32. Jack Stevens

    I hate the small font on these blog pages...half the time I just close out the story cause I am not going to squint my eyes to read it. I did read this story though and it was interesting.

    December 21, 2010 at 12:21 | Report abuse | Reply
    • abbyful

      Hold down "Ctrl" and hit "+", that will increase the font size.
      Or go to "View" and "Text Size".
      Or hold down "Ctrl" and use the scroll-bar on your mouse to adjust font size.

      December 21, 2010 at 14:04 | Report abuse |
    • Jack Stevens

      Thank you!

      December 22, 2010 at 10:44 | Report abuse |
  33. M.L. McFall

    Why can't people spell its correctly. It's means it is. Period.

    December 21, 2010 at 12:40 | Report abuse | Reply
  34. Alex Nielsen

    Hi,

    Once you are diagnosed as being a diabetic, it will be for a lifetime. Millions of people all over the world suffer from this chronic diabetes problem that may result in a range of complications responsible for disabilities, reduced quality of life, shortened life expectancy, and pregnancy-related complications for the mother,the fetus or the newborn baby. As the diabetes begins to climb around the world,the government and other health care providers are initiating efforts to invest in health education, diagnosis and treatments for this chronic, unbearable – but controllable – disorder. The body produces insulin, however the body itself doesn’t respond to it or utilize it properly giving it the chance to increase high level of sugar in the blood, since it was not process and taken in.

    If you wanna read more go too:
    http://www.diabetesbloodsugarcontrol.info

    Regards
    Alex Nielsen

    December 21, 2010 at 13:17 | Report abuse | Reply
    • Kevin

      Diabetes can be reversed, assuming you stop listening to conventional wisdom that grains (sugars) are the foundation of health. Wanna learn more? http://diabetes.about.com/od/nutrition/qt/locarbdiabetes.htm The problem is people insist on continuing to put sugar into their system when it is killing them. Your body does not need sugar! There are countless studies proving this.

      December 21, 2010 at 14:52 | Report abuse |
  35. Donna Bunyard

    When it comes to a diabetic diet...eat the ‘good fats’. Foods such as fish...avocado...nuts and seeds contain beneficial fats. Omega 3 fats are particularly important because they have anti-inflammatory effects. High blood sugar levels and Insulin Resistance are associated with inflammation and therefore omega 3 can be helpful. Olive oil is the healthiest of oils in the kitchen.

    December 27, 2010 at 00:25 | Report abuse | Reply
  36. weight loss

    [...] Can a fat protect you from diabetes? – The Chart – CNN.com Blogs [...]

    January 2, 2011 at 21:03 | Report abuse | Reply
  37. Chicas de Poker

    como estas? mi nombre es Ana y penso que su espacio online es muy bueno, bon trabajo hay gustad mucho!:)
    abrazo
    excusa mi mal espanol!Sólo te falta un botón de traducción el resto todo bie!

    June 19, 2011 at 17:10 | Report abuse | Reply
  38. SitWabGantind

    online payday loans payday loans using western union http://www.payday-money-online.net payday laws texas [url=http://www.payday-money-online.net]cash advance[/url] payday loans in stafford va

    April 10, 2013 at 00:04 | Report abuse | Reply
  39. cartier copy love ring wedding band

    Awesome post. I am a normal visitor of your web site and appreciate you taking the time to maintain the nice site. I will be a frequent visitor for a long time.
    cartier copy love ring wedding band

    August 22, 2017 at 22:13 | Report abuse | Reply

Leave a Reply to Curt


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

Advertisement
About this blog

Get a behind-the-scenes look at the latest stories from CNN Chief Medical Correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen and the CNN Medical Unit producers. They'll share news and views on health and medical trends - info that will help you take better care of yourself and the people you love.